[IGSREPORT-5933] Wk 1001 MIT T2 Analysis Report
Thomas
Thomas
Mon Apr 5 14:13:11 PDT 1999
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Mon Apr 5 14:13:11 PDT 1999 Message Number 5933
******************************************************************************
Author: Thomas Herring
Subject: Wk 1001 MIT T2 Analysis Report
********************************************************************************
MIT ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 1001 Dates: 99mar14 to 99mar20
********************************************************************************
MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
Room 54-618
77 Massachusetts Avenue,
Cambridge, MA 02139
e-mail: tah at mtglas.mit.edu
tel: (617)253-5941 (Tom Herring)
fax: (617)253-1699
PRODUCTS GENERATED:
The following products are generated and uploaded into CDDIS @ NASA/GSFC
MIT1001g.SNX Combined sinex file from all available analysis centers
MIT1001g.SUM Name of this summary file
MIT1001g.RES File of the individual AC position estimates residuals
to the combined solution for the week.
0.0 Starting Week 998 we adopted full checking of the center sinex
headers and we correct the solutions for differences between the
headers and a modified version of IGS.SNX. (The modifications are
to put full precision antenna L1/L2 offsets and to correct the WUHN
entry. The station log for this site shows height to BCR not ARP).
A new error reporting block has been added below. We also have
removed some of the routine documention in this summary.
0.1 Starting week 993 we started to add corrections for the pole-tide to
the SIO, NGS, and ESA sinex. According to the analysis descriptions
none of these centers apply the pole tide correction. Starting with
the re-submission of week 992, we corrected the LOD values in JPL sinex
files from regularized LOD (should be called LODR in the SINEX file)
to standard LOD. (Since starting multiday polar motion combinations
we have been correcting the sign error in the JPL LOD values.
0.2 Starting week 989 we include as Section 5.0 of this summary, the
Earth rotation parameter estimates from the constrained combination
solution in the IERS format.
0.3 Starting Week 980 we include multiday polar motion/UT1 estimates into
our analysis. We also no longer need to deconstrain the AC sinex
files although to add back into the covariance matrices at rotational
uncertainity which is coupled between station positions and EOPs.
0.4 Starting Week 0943 we base the analysis on the ITRF96 system and the
reference site list for the ITRF96 system. The increase in the number
of sites used to obtain analysis variances increases the variance
factors for all centers by factors between 2 and 4. The Chi**2 for
the center residuals is now much closer to 1.0
0.5 Starting Week 0931 we added a new residual file to our submissions.
A description of the contents of the file is given in the file itself.
We also changed the treatment of the translation of the individual
AC solutions. The generation of the weighting factors and the constrained
combined solution remains unchanged. However, in the unconstrained
analyses (used for AC comparisons) we now allow explicit translation
and scale parameters in the solution. The net effect is to generate
more realisitic sigmas for the center of mass position estimates and to
make the coordinate estimates immune to real center of mass translations
and scale changes.
0.6 Starting Week 0901 we started using a new apriori file not Non-ITRF94 coordinates
based on the analysis of week 0822-0900 sinex files.
1.0 Analysis Procedures:
(1) Each centers sinex solutions are de-constrained by adding back
in a rotational uncertainty.
(2) Covariance matrices from each center are re-scaled to generate
unit increment in chi square per degree in the tight constraints solution.
The values are are based in the chi**2 per degree of freedom increment
when the loosely constrained solution is constrained to the ITRF1996
coordinates of the 55 Reference sites. Orientation changes are estimated
in this step, but translations and scale are NOT estimated.
(3) The tight solution is generated with the following constraints on
the core sites. Starting Week 0858, ITRF94 is used for the coordinate
system. Starting Week 0878, we changed the site selection here to use
WTZR and GOL2. Starting Week 0897 we stopped using MADR as a core site.
We continue not use MADR in the reference site list.
Earth rotation parameters are estimated for each center (even when not given
in the original SINEX files. In this case the partial derivatives are
computed from the station coordinates).
(4) When the combined and center solutions are compared to ITRF96, the
heights are given a variance 10 times larger than the horizontal coordinates.
The same variance ratio is used when the RMS to ITRF96 core sites is
computed.
(5) Starting Week 0826, we show the differences in the coordinates for
five non-core sites, in remote areas. Four of these sites are processed
by all centers. These sites are not used in the RMS calculations or
the transformation estimation to the 13 core sites. The change in procedure
was because FORT is no longer being processed by all centers. AREQ has
been added to the list for this reason. After Week 0943, when the reference
site list increased we no long summarize additional sites.
(6) Starting Week 0826, we start to show a comparison of each centers
results with the combined solution for the week. When the constraints
are applied to loose combined solution to translate, rotate and scale it
to the ITRF96, the constraints are actually applied using the full
covariance matrix of the combined solution (rather than simply directly
applying the transformations to the coordinates). The approach we use
constrains the center of mass to have zero variance relative to ITRF96.
The result of this is that the combined solution has the same center
of mass position and scale as ITRF96, and therefore when each of the
centers are compared to the combined solution, they generate very similar
translations and scales as they do the ITRF96. Had we simply applied
the transformations to the coordinates, the translations and scale would
have been the difference between the combined translations and scale and
the individual center's translations and scale.
This new section is numbered 4.0.
(7) Starting Week 868, we updated the coordinates of sites not included
in the ITRF94 coordinate files. This introduces a discontinuity in the
the adjustments to some of the "isolated" sites shown below.
CENTER SINEX ERRORS: (corrected during processing).
CNT Site Type of Error Used values IGS.SNX values
NRC GOUG Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .0030 Real .0000 .0000 .0380 m
NRC NYAL Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 5.2159 Real .0000 .0000 5.2160 m
NRC ONSA Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .9949 Real .0000 .0000 .9950 m
COM REYK Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .0680 Real .0000 .0000 .0685 m
NOA MAG0 Used DORNE MARGOLIN B dL1 .0000 .0000 .0780 dL2 .0000 .0000 .0960 m
NOA MAG0 Real DORNE MARGOLIN A dL1 .0000 .0000 .1100 dL2 .0000 .0000 .1280 m
NOA TIXI Used ASHTECH CHOKE RI dL1 .0003 .0001 .1080 dL2 .0006 .0017 .1282 m
NOA TIXI Real DORNE MARGOLIN A dL1 .0000 .0000 .1100 dL2 .0000 .0000 .1280 m
NOA WUHN Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 2.3550 Real .0000 .0000 2.3200 m
COD WUHN Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 2.3550 Real .0000 .0000 2.3200 m
COD REYK Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .0680 Real .0000 .0000 .0685 m
JPL MDVO Used EXT. L1/L2 KINEM dL1 .0000 .0000 .0000 dL2 .0000 .0000 .0000 m
JPL MDVO Real 4000ST L1/L2 GEO dL1 .0000 -.0030 .0780 dL2 -.0031 -.0013 .0744 m
JPL REYK Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .0680 Real .0000 .0000 .0685 m
JPL WUHN Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 2.3550 Real .0000 .0000 2.3200 m
JPL BARB Used ASHTECH CHOKERIN dL1 .0000 .0000 .0000 dL2 .0000 .0000 .0000 m
JPL BARB Real ASHTECH CHOKERIN dL1 .0000 .0000 .1100 dL2 .0000 .0000 .1280 m
SIO CAGL Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .0100 Real .0000 .0000 .0450 m
ESA MDVO Eccentricity: Used .0000 .0000 .1460 Real .0000 .0000 .1456 m
2.0 COMBINED FIT TO ITRF 1996
Transformation of loose solution COMBINED to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 41 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 3.9 mm COMBINED wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
3.2 0.8 0.3 0.8 1.2 0.8 -1.006 0.097 COMBINED CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for COMBINED
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -1.2 0.5 2.7 0.6 -2.9 1.8 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
FORT 0.2 0.9 -10.0 1.6 0.8 3.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
BRAZ 10.6 3.1 -0.4 5.2 36.0 11.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
KOUR -0.7 0.9 -12.7 1.6 -5.7 5.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
OHIG 10.4 5.1 1.4 7.0 34.4 16.5 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
BRMU -1.8 0.4 1.2 0.6 -5.6 2.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
SANT 9.1 1.2 0.5 1.8 -14.7 4.5 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
AREQ 4.8 1.1 -0.5 2.0 -12.4 5.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
WES2 -0.8 0.4 4.9 0.5 8.4 1.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
GODE -3.3 0.5 12.7 0.5 14.1 2.1 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
ALGO -1.1 0.4 2.4 0.4 8.5 1.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
NLIB -0.7 0.4 0.0 0.5 11.4 1.9 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
MDO1 1.4 0.5 -1.3 0.6 -11.3 2.3 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
PIE1 -1.8 0.5 1.8 0.6 4.8 2.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
YELL -1.2 0.5 2.2 0.5 6.2 1.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
GOLD -4.8 0.5 -6.2 0.6 -12.5 2.3 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
GOL2 -2.1 0.7 -1.2 0.8 5.9 2.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
DRAO -3.0 0.4 0.7 0.5 -3.9 1.5 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
FAIR 0.1 0.5 -1.7 0.6 -13.0 1.7 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
KOKB -1.2 0.8 1.0 1.4 32.7 2.8 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
MAC1 -0.1 2.5 -13.2 2.3 -0.6 10.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
TID2 2.1 0.9 3.0 1.2 13.3 3.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
TIDB -0.8 0.8 -3.4 1.2 4.3 2.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
HOB2 0.4 1.9 -4.9 1.8 13.2 9.2 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
GUAM -4.4 1.0 5.6 1.8 7.2 4.2 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
TSKB 6.1 0.7 -5.4 0.9 15.8 2.2 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
SHAO 1.1 0.7 4.4 1.0 0.2 2.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
PERT 1.1 0.7 -4.4 1.1 -5.0 2.7 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
YAR1 -0.1 0.7 -1.8 1.0 5.0 2.4 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
IRKT 1.0 0.6 3.3 0.7 -7.3 1.7 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
DAV1 12.5 4.3 9.7 4.0 -10.9 15.1 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
KIT3 3.0 0.8 -2.0 1.1 -24.9 3.8 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
MALI 5.6 1.1 -1.6 2.0 -16.8 4.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -5.3 0.5 8.2 0.5 -20.1 1.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
TROM -2.9 0.9 0.9 1.5 5.7 4.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
MATE -2.9 0.5 1.2 0.6 -0.6 2.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
GRAZ -1.6 0.5 1.8 0.5 -12.9 2.0 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
POTS -2.0 0.4 1.0 0.5 -23.7 1.7 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
WTZR 0.0 0.4 2.5 0.5 -1.5 1.6 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
ONSA 1.6 0.5 3.5 0.5 -1.8 1.5 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
NYAL -2.3 1.7 -2.0 2.6 29.3 7.3 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
MADR 11.2 1.1 4.7 2.2 0.2 5.7 COMBINED wrt ITRF96
3.0 CENTER FITS TO ITRF 1996
CENTER EMR
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR EMR 21.54
Transformation of loose solution EMR to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 21 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 8.8 mm EMR wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
38.9 14.3 2.0 17.2 -441.5 57.0 -4.314 0.748 EMR CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for EMR
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL 0.2 3.8 -1.2 6.6 1.2 14.5 EMR wrt ITRF96
OHIG 36.7 36.2 27.3 44.8 135.7 98.5 EMR wrt ITRF96
BRMU 6.1 3.4 -7.8 6.8 -28.5 11.9 EMR wrt ITRF96
AREQ 3.4 8.3 11.2 22.6 -19.1 36.1 EMR wrt ITRF96
ALGO 6.6 2.9 -10.8 5.4 0.7 9.6 EMR wrt ITRF96
YELL 5.8 3.2 2.5 5.1 -0.3 10.4 EMR wrt ITRF96
GOLD -2.1 3.3 -11.5 6.3 -23.0 12.3 EMR wrt ITRF96
DRAO 4.2 3.0 -0.3 5.0 -11.5 9.4 EMR wrt ITRF96
FAIR 11.1 3.3 -2.1 5.2 -9.8 11.0 EMR wrt ITRF96
KOKB -10.8 6.6 -10.3 15.6 -3.1 36.2 EMR wrt ITRF96
KWJ1 -8.6 5.5 24.1 13.4 21.0 29.7 EMR wrt ITRF96
TIDB -4.8 5.5 6.8 9.1 55.0 15.6 EMR wrt ITRF96
GUAM -5.7 4.9 -4.9 11.7 -5.9 24.2 EMR wrt ITRF96
TSKB 17.5 3.9 -4.2 6.7 1.4 14.6 EMR wrt ITRF96
YAR1 0.3 4.8 -5.8 10.3 41.7 17.1 EMR wrt ITRF96
IRKT 11.9 4.2 -6.5 7.1 -1.7 11.3 EMR wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -1.3 3.5 -7.3 5.8 -20.1 10.1 EMR wrt ITRF96
WTZR 0.4 3.3 -6.0 5.2 0.9 10.5 EMR wrt ITRF96
ONSA -1.3 3.3 -7.1 5.0 -0.7 10.7 EMR wrt ITRF96
NYAL -8.0 6.1 -8.1 7.8 20.9 24.7 EMR wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER JPL
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR JPL 7.71
Transformation of loose solution JPL to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 23 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 4.4 mm JPL wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
-5.8 7.7 -21.3 7.2 -34.8 9.2 -0.891 0.299 JPL CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for JPL
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL 2.6 3.3 4.3 2.9 -7.6 11.3 JPL wrt ITRF96
FORT -5.1 2.5 -12.9 5.6 -3.4 10.1 JPL wrt ITRF96
BRAZ 4.1 3.2 -0.8 5.0 32.5 11.5 JPL wrt ITRF96
OHIG 8.0 5.1 3.5 6.7 32.8 16.8 JPL wrt ITRF96
SANT -1.3 3.4 6.2 6.6 -6.7 12.1 JPL wrt ITRF96
GODE -3.5 1.6 11.2 1.8 1.6 5.7 JPL wrt ITRF96
ALGO -1.8 1.4 0.8 1.6 -7.8 4.7 JPL wrt ITRF96
MDO1 3.4 3.2 -2.9 3.5 -26.3 14.2 JPL wrt ITRF96
PIE1 -2.0 2.4 1.7 2.5 -8.7 9.8 JPL wrt ITRF96
YELL 0.0 1.6 3.1 1.3 -7.0 5.0 JPL wrt ITRF96
GOL2 -0.5 1.5 -2.0 1.8 -3.0 5.6 JPL wrt ITRF96
DRAO -2.9 1.5 0.2 1.5 -16.9 5.0 JPL wrt ITRF96
FAIR 2.7 1.6 -2.8 2.0 -22.3 5.2 JPL wrt ITRF96
KOKB -1.3 2.3 -11.1 3.2 25.8 8.9 JPL wrt ITRF96
KWJ1 -4.5 2.5 11.2 3.0 20.6 10.0 JPL wrt ITRF96
TID2 3.7 2.4 4.5 2.5 19.3 6.5 JPL wrt ITRF96
TSKB 7.7 1.7 -9.5 1.8 19.1 5.5 JPL wrt ITRF96
SHAO 3.5 3.2 -1.6 3.4 5.2 13.1 JPL wrt ITRF96
YAR1 -0.7 2.2 0.5 2.7 -3.2 7.0 JPL wrt ITRF96
IRKT 1.7 1.7 0.3 1.7 -5.9 5.1 JPL wrt ITRF96
MALI 2.6 2.7 -2.8 4.6 -5.1 9.2 JPL wrt ITRF96
WTZR 4.5 1.7 2.3 1.7 -5.0 5.1 JPL wrt ITRF96
ONSA 6.0 1.7 2.7 1.6 -9.6 4.8 JPL wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER GFZ
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR GFZ 69.9
Transformation of loose solution GFZ to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 29 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 4.0 mm GFZ wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
2.2 1.3 0.1 1.4 3.5 1.2 -0.520 0.202 GFZ CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for GFZ
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -1.0 1.1 0.8 1.2 -0.7 3.8 GFZ wrt ITRF96
FORT 3.4 1.8 -9.9 2.3 20.7 7.4 GFZ wrt ITRF96
BRMU 0.0 1.1 -0.7 1.2 -7.4 4.2 GFZ wrt ITRF96
SANT 12.6 6.1 8.7 6.2 20.4 25.9 GFZ wrt ITRF96
AREQ 9.3 2.2 0.1 2.4 4.2 8.6 GFZ wrt ITRF96
WES2 0.7 1.0 4.3 0.9 5.6 3.6 GFZ wrt ITRF96
ALGO -0.7 1.0 0.6 0.9 6.9 3.5 GFZ wrt ITRF96
NLIB 1.6 1.1 1.3 1.0 13.6 4.1 GFZ wrt ITRF96
MDO1 3.6 1.1 0.3 1.1 -14.0 4.7 GFZ wrt ITRF96
YELL -2.6 1.2 2.4 0.9 1.5 3.7 GFZ wrt ITRF96
GOL2 0.1 1.1 0.0 1.2 9.6 4.2 GFZ wrt ITRF96
DRAO -3.7 1.1 2.0 1.0 -3.6 3.4 GFZ wrt ITRF96
FAIR -0.2 1.2 3.8 1.1 -18.0 3.9 GFZ wrt ITRF96
KOKB -2.9 1.6 1.1 2.4 28.5 6.1 GFZ wrt ITRF96
MAC1 -1.9 5.0 -14.0 3.9 -0.6 16.5 GFZ wrt ITRF96
TID2 4.7 1.8 0.5 2.0 10.5 5.1 GFZ wrt ITRF96
HOB2 1.7 4.3 -6.0 3.8 1.3 15.9 GFZ wrt ITRF96
GUAM -6.5 2.0 6.1 2.7 25.5 8.1 GFZ wrt ITRF96
TSKB 2.8 1.4 -4.6 1.6 23.3 4.7 GFZ wrt ITRF96
YAR1 1.8 2.4 -2.4 2.9 -2.6 9.3 GFZ wrt ITRF96
IRKT -1.4 1.3 3.3 1.3 -10.3 3.8 GFZ wrt ITRF96
DAV1 15.2 6.6 8.3 5.8 -4.8 22.3 GFZ wrt ITRF96
KIT3 0.6 2.2 1.0 2.2 -29.2 8.5 GFZ wrt ITRF96
MALI 2.6 2.3 -4.7 3.1 8.6 9.1 GFZ wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -4.2 1.1 7.2 1.0 -18.3 3.6 GFZ wrt ITRF96
MATE -3.2 1.1 -1.1 1.1 -6.4 4.0 GFZ wrt ITRF96
POTS -2.0 1.1 -1.9 1.0 -31.0 3.7 GFZ wrt ITRF96
WTZR -0.9 1.1 0.0 1.0 -6.9 3.9 GFZ wrt ITRF96
ONSA 0.1 1.2 1.7 1.0 -8.4 3.9 GFZ wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER COD
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR COD 47.55
Transformation of loose solution COD to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 35 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 4.3 mm COD wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
-8.0 2.9 7.0 2.8 -20.1 4.2 -1.476 0.155 COD CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for COD
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -0.9 0.8 2.3 1.0 -2.3 3.0 COD wrt ITRF96
FORT -0.8 1.5 -14.1 2.9 -8.9 6.2 COD wrt ITRF96
KOUR -1.1 1.3 -16.3 2.3 4.6 8.2 COD wrt ITRF96
BRMU -2.5 0.7 2.3 1.0 2.1 3.3 COD wrt ITRF96
SANT 12.2 2.0 -3.9 3.3 -34.7 7.2 COD wrt ITRF96
AREQ 6.6 1.8 1.4 5.0 -28.0 7.9 COD wrt ITRF96
WES2 -1.9 0.6 5.9 0.8 12.1 2.4 COD wrt ITRF96
ALGO -2.0 0.6 3.8 0.7 14.5 2.4 COD wrt ITRF96
NLIB -1.4 0.6 0.2 0.7 16.5 3.0 COD wrt ITRF96
MDO1 0.4 0.8 -0.4 1.0 1.4 3.5 COD wrt ITRF96
PIE1 -2.6 0.7 2.5 0.9 13.7 3.3 COD wrt ITRF96
YELL -1.4 0.8 2.3 0.7 14.0 2.5 COD wrt ITRF96
GOLD -5.4 0.8 -5.8 1.0 -5.1 3.1 COD wrt ITRF96
DRAO -3.9 0.7 0.9 0.8 4.0 2.4 COD wrt ITRF96
FAIR -0.7 0.8 -2.6 1.0 -9.3 2.7 COD wrt ITRF96
KOKB -4.1 1.5 2.5 2.9 23.9 5.5 COD wrt ITRF96
MAC1 -0.7 3.1 -11.9 3.2 10.2 13.7 COD wrt ITRF96
TIDB -0.5 1.2 -2.1 2.0 -0.6 3.7 COD wrt ITRF96
HOB2 -0.1 2.2 -3.6 2.5 13.2 11.3 COD wrt ITRF96
GUAM -3.5 1.8 4.2 3.6 8.0 8.0 COD wrt ITRF96
TSKB 6.0 1.2 -6.3 1.8 13.6 4.0 COD wrt ITRF96
SHAO 0.6 1.3 2.9 1.9 4.4 4.0 COD wrt ITRF96
PERT 1.3 1.2 -5.6 1.9 -16.8 4.2 COD wrt ITRF96
YAR1 0.4 1.2 -2.7 1.9 -9.9 4.0 COD wrt ITRF96
IRKT -0.8 1.1 4.9 1.4 0.7 3.1 COD wrt ITRF96
DAV1 11.4 7.2 10.9 6.4 21.1 21.9 COD wrt ITRF96
KIT3 1.3 1.3 -1.2 1.8 -18.0 7.5 COD wrt ITRF96
MALI 7.7 2.0 -3.0 4.4 -19.0 7.6 COD wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -6.2 0.8 9.8 0.9 -16.1 2.7 COD wrt ITRF96
MATE -2.8 0.8 1.8 1.0 0.8 3.3 COD wrt ITRF96
GRAZ -1.6 0.7 2.6 0.9 -11.0 2.7 COD wrt ITRF96
POTS -1.9 0.8 2.0 0.8 -18.7 2.8 COD wrt ITRF96
WTZR 0.0 0.7 3.3 0.9 1.2 3.0 COD wrt ITRF96
ONSA 1.7 0.8 4.8 0.8 1.5 2.6 COD wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER SIO
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR SIO 2.512
Transformation of loose solution SIO to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 32 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 4.9 mm SIO wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
7.1 7.1 -7.4 6.6 -186.9 22.0 -0.976 0.260 SIO CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for SIO
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -1.3 1.5 -2.2 2.6 -3.6 4.7 SIO wrt ITRF96
FORT -4.6 2.5 -9.0 5.9 10.2 8.1 SIO wrt ITRF96
KOUR -1.5 2.4 -14.2 6.3 -2.1 11.7 SIO wrt ITRF96
BRMU -1.5 1.3 0.9 3.1 -8.2 5.5 SIO wrt ITRF96
SANT 1.9 3.5 2.9 7.4 -22.6 10.3 SIO wrt ITRF96
AREQ 5.3 3.4 2.1 10.0 -20.2 14.5 SIO wrt ITRF96
WES2 -0.2 1.2 6.0 2.6 18.3 3.6 SIO wrt ITRF96
GODE -3.5 1.3 11.7 2.9 2.9 5.0 SIO wrt ITRF96
ALGO -0.1 1.0 1.5 2.0 12.2 3.1 SIO wrt ITRF96
NLIB 1.3 1.3 0.5 2.7 6.5 4.9 SIO wrt ITRF96
MDO1 6.3 1.4 -5.2 3.1 -18.9 5.4 SIO wrt ITRF96
PIE1 2.4 1.4 -0.2 3.0 6.0 5.3 SIO wrt ITRF96
YELL -0.3 1.6 3.8 2.4 14.3 4.5 SIO wrt ITRF96
GOL2 1.7 1.3 0.3 2.5 5.3 4.2 SIO wrt ITRF96
DRAO 1.8 1.2 0.6 2.0 -4.9 3.2 SIO wrt ITRF96
FAIR 4.0 1.7 -0.1 2.6 -14.6 4.5 SIO wrt ITRF96
KOKB 7.6 2.2 5.1 3.7 44.7 5.2 SIO wrt ITRF96
TID2 -4.1 2.3 -12.4 3.8 29.1 6.0 SIO wrt ITRF96
GUAM -11.3 2.4 7.0 5.5 -9.2 9.5 SIO wrt ITRF96
TSKB 4.8 2.1 -7.4 3.5 -1.1 9.0 SIO wrt ITRF96
SHAO 0.4 2.1 6.0 3.8 0.5 5.7 SIO wrt ITRF96
PERT -2.0 2.0 -7.7 3.9 20.9 6.9 SIO wrt ITRF96
YAR1 -2.9 1.9 -5.7 3.8 44.4 5.8 SIO wrt ITRF96
IRKT 2.3 2.1 3.4 3.0 6.1 4.4 SIO wrt ITRF96
KIT3 6.4 1.9 -0.4 3.6 -32.0 6.5 SIO wrt ITRF96
MALI 1.7 3.2 17.9 8.2 -33.3 12.8 SIO wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -1.9 1.4 6.2 2.2 -26.4 3.6 SIO wrt ITRF96
MATE -1.0 1.5 -0.4 2.6 -5.2 5.0 SIO wrt ITRF96
GRAZ 1.0 1.5 -1.1 2.6 -16.5 6.4 SIO wrt ITRF96
POTS 1.0 1.3 -2.5 2.1 -28.6 4.2 SIO wrt ITRF96
WTZR 3.1 1.3 -1.4 2.0 -4.5 3.7 SIO wrt ITRF96
ONSA 4.4 1.3 -2.0 1.8 -1.0 3.0 SIO wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER NGS
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR NGS 169.6
Transformation of loose solution NGS to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 34 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 5.7 mm NGS wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
8.7 13.7 -7.8 14.1 -161.5 48.6 -2.343 0.747 NGS CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for NGS
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -0.4 4.0 10.7 6.1 7.2 8.5 NGS wrt ITRF96
FORT 0.3 8.1 -23.8 17.5 -39.3 23.2 NGS wrt ITRF96
KOUR -2.6 5.4 -19.9 10.2 -30.7 15.2 NGS wrt ITRF96
BRMU -0.7 3.0 0.0 5.2 -13.0 7.0 NGS wrt ITRF96
SANT -5.5 15.2 -14.2 23.0 10.3 20.8 NGS wrt ITRF96
AREQ -5.9 9.9 -16.9 21.9 4.5 25.4 NGS wrt ITRF96
WES2 2.5 3.0 5.5 4.4 -1.4 5.7 NGS wrt ITRF96
GODE -1.7 2.8 11.2 4.3 11.6 6.3 NGS wrt ITRF96
ALGO 2.4 2.9 2.3 4.1 5.6 5.7 NGS wrt ITRF96
NLIB -1.2 2.7 2.5 4.2 11.2 6.6 NGS wrt ITRF96
MDO1 -3.8 2.9 -2.8 4.9 -22.7 8.8 NGS wrt ITRF96
PIE1 -5.6 2.9 2.1 4.8 -9.2 8.1 NGS wrt ITRF96
YELL 3.9 3.4 4.2 4.7 4.0 6.7 NGS wrt ITRF96
GOLD -7.8 3.1 -1.9 5.1 -24.1 8.1 NGS wrt ITRF96
DRAO -0.3 3.0 2.0 4.6 -9.8 6.5 NGS wrt ITRF96
FAIR 9.1 3.6 -6.8 4.9 -8.8 6.7 NGS wrt ITRF96
KOKB -3.5 5.8 9.1 10.2 30.1 15.2 NGS wrt ITRF96
TIDB -6.6 8.7 6.1 13.9 10.4 13.5 NGS wrt ITRF96
GUAM -1.4 5.1 -0.2 9.6 -12.0 14.6 NGS wrt ITRF96
TSKB 11.0 4.1 -14.6 6.4 25.2 7.9 NGS wrt ITRF96
SHAO 4.3 4.2 -0.7 6.7 2.8 7.8 NGS wrt ITRF96
PERT -4.2 7.7 -13.8 12.5 0.6 13.0 NGS wrt ITRF96
YAR1 -3.6 7.1 -11.0 12.3 2.4 13.2 NGS wrt ITRF96
IRKT 4.5 3.7 7.5 5.6 -2.9 6.2 NGS wrt ITRF96
KIT3 9.7 4.2 0.5 6.7 -19.0 12.1 NGS wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -0.4 2.7 8.7 3.9 -8.6 7.1 NGS wrt ITRF96
TROM 0.2 3.3 -1.9 4.0 13.2 7.1 NGS wrt ITRF96
MATE -0.1 3.6 7.0 5.2 16.4 8.6 NGS wrt ITRF96
GRAZ 1.2 3.1 5.2 4.6 2.9 7.8 NGS wrt ITRF96
POTS 0.5 2.9 1.9 4.3 -12.9 7.5 NGS wrt ITRF96
WTZR 2.6 3.1 4.7 4.6 13.2 7.8 NGS wrt ITRF96
ONSA 3.9 3.0 1.9 4.2 10.6 7.9 NGS wrt ITRF96
NYAL -0.1 4.3 -3.9 5.0 36.4 10.0 NGS wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
MADR 12.4 4.1 12.7 6.2 11.9 9.1 NGS wrt ITRF96
CENTER ESA
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR ESA 7.296
Transformation of loose solution ESA to ITRF96
-----------------------------------------------
For 27 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 6.6 mm ESA wrt ITRF96
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
10.5 9.0 8.1 9.0 -2.7 8.1 -2.521 0.535 ESA CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for ESA
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -6.9 2.5 10.4 4.9 -2.6 7.2 ESA wrt ITRF96
FORT -3.0 4.5 -20.4 16.9 -21.5 17.8 ESA wrt ITRF96
KOUR -3.8 3.9 -3.4 20.0 -2.0 17.2 ESA wrt ITRF96
BRMU -6.7 2.3 3.6 6.9 6.6 7.5 ESA wrt ITRF96
SANT 22.3 7.1 -5.8 20.1 -3.9 25.4 ESA wrt ITRF96
AREQ 9.1 6.2 -18.4 34.7 15.8 30.3 ESA wrt ITRF96
ALGO -2.2 2.4 8.1 4.7 6.6 6.4 ESA wrt ITRF96
NLIB -1.0 2.6 2.4 5.8 5.3 7.7 ESA wrt ITRF96
YELL 4.3 3.1 -1.8 4.4 4.5 7.1 ESA wrt ITRF96
GOLD -1.6 3.0 0.9 5.3 -2.0 8.9 ESA wrt ITRF96
FAIR 1.8 3.3 -10.4 4.8 10.2 8.2 ESA wrt ITRF96
KOKB 4.7 4.6 2.5 8.4 38.0 14.7 ESA wrt ITRF96
KWJ1 4.9 5.4 23.6 20.6 -0.3 22.6 ESA wrt ITRF96
TIDB 0.5 4.7 -11.7 7.5 -19.9 9.9 ESA wrt ITRF96
TSKB 1.6 3.3 11.7 6.4 22.9 7.7 ESA wrt ITRF96
SHAO -2.5 3.2 19.4 7.1 1.3 8.5 ESA wrt ITRF96
PERT 6.6 3.6 -23.6 7.6 -1.4 11.1 ESA wrt ITRF96
YAR1 5.2 3.5 -19.4 8.0 17.9 11.2 ESA wrt ITRF96
IRKT 0.5 3.2 13.8 4.9 -34.2 6.4 ESA wrt ITRF96
KIT3 1.4 3.9 -2.4 9.1 -10.9 13.8 ESA wrt ITRF96
ZWEN -4.1 2.3 4.1 3.6 -26.5 6.1 ESA wrt ITRF96
TROM -2.8 2.5 3.2 3.3 -0.9 7.2 ESA wrt ITRF96
MATE -7.6 2.6 -2.4 5.2 11.5 8.5 ESA wrt ITRF96
POTS -4.7 2.2 0.8 3.7 -19.9 6.3 ESA wrt ITRF96
WTZR -3.5 2.2 1.8 3.8 5.8 6.5 ESA wrt ITRF96
ONSA 2.8 2.5 6.0 4.0 -1.8 7.9 ESA wrt ITRF96
NYAL 1.6 4.0 -2.7 4.7 13.4 14.3 ESA wrt ITRF96
Reference sites NOT used
4.0 CENTER FITS TO COMBINED SOLUTION
CENTER EMR
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR EMR 21.54
Transformation of loose solution EMR to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 20 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 6.6 mm EMR wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
43.1 14.5 -1.0 17.4 -439.3 57.0 -4.331 0.764 EMR CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for EMR
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL 0.6 4.1 2.4 6.4 -0.4 14.6 EMR wrt COMB
OHIG 18.6 35.6 26.0 44.3 101.3 98.3 EMR wrt COMB
BRMU 6.1 3.3 -5.8 6.8 -27.8 11.6 EMR wrt COMB
AREQ -6.9 7.9 14.1 22.0 -10.0 35.9 EMR wrt COMB
ALGO 7.0 2.9 -11.4 5.4 -11.9 9.3 EMR wrt COMB
YELL 6.2 3.2 0.1 5.0 -8.8 10.4 EMR wrt COMB
GOLD 0.8 3.3 -4.1 6.4 -12.4 12.3 EMR wrt COMB
DRAO 5.8 3.0 -0.5 5.1 -9.6 9.4 EMR wrt COMB
FAIR 9.1 3.3 -0.6 5.2 2.1 10.9 EMR wrt COMB
KOKB -11.5 6.6 -9.3 15.6 -33.8 36.2 EMR wrt COMB
KWJ1 -4.9 5.4 7.5 13.3 13.6 29.6 EMR wrt COMB
TIDB -0.4 5.1 14.3 8.9 56.3 15.6 EMR wrt COMB
GUAM -2.2 4.7 -4.8 11.6 -8.5 24.0 EMR wrt COMB
TSKB 9.1 3.9 6.4 6.6 -11.4 14.4 EMR wrt COMB
YAR1 2.9 4.7 4.1 9.8 41.8 17.1 EMR wrt COMB
IRKT 8.4 4.4 -4.0 6.9 6.4 11.2 EMR wrt COMB
ZWEN 3.5 3.7 -9.1 5.7 -2.5 10.4 EMR wrt COMB
WTZR 0.0 3.6 -2.2 5.1 -1.4 10.8 EMR wrt COMB
ONSA -2.7 3.4 -5.2 4.8 -2.4 10.9 EMR wrt COMB
NYAL -4.3 6.0 -3.0 7.7 -11.1 24.7 EMR wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER JPL
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR JPL 7.71
Transformation of loose solution JPL to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 23 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 2.4 mm JPL wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
-6.4 7.7 -17.9 7.2 -35.6 9.2 -1.500 0.299 JPL CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for JPL
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL 5.1 3.3 1.0 2.9 0.4 11.3 JPL wrt COMB
FORT -2.2 2.5 -3.1 5.6 2.2 10.1 JPL wrt COMB
BRAZ -2.8 3.2 -0.5 5.0 3.0 11.5 JPL wrt COMB
OHIG 3.0 5.1 1.6 6.7 2.9 16.8 JPL wrt COMB
SANT -5.8 3.4 7.0 6.6 14.3 12.1 JPL wrt COMB
GODE 0.3 1.6 -0.5 1.8 -5.4 5.7 JPL wrt COMB
ALGO -0.5 1.4 -0.9 1.6 -9.5 4.7 JPL wrt COMB
MDO1 2.6 3.2 0.7 3.5 -8.1 14.2 JPL wrt COMB
PIE1 0.3 2.4 2.3 2.5 -6.7 9.8 JPL wrt COMB
YELL 0.3 1.6 2.2 1.3 -7.3 5.0 JPL wrt COMB
GOL2 1.9 1.5 1.8 1.8 -2.4 5.6 JPL wrt COMB
DRAO -0.2 1.5 1.5 1.5 -6.8 5.0 JPL wrt COMB
FAIR 1.9 1.6 0.9 2.0 -4.1 5.2 JPL wrt COMB
KOKB 0.1 2.3 -7.7 3.2 -2.1 8.9 JPL wrt COMB
KWJ1 -0.5 2.5 -4.5 3.0 11.5 10.0 JPL wrt COMB
TID2 -0.8 2.4 6.3 2.5 7.6 6.5 JPL wrt COMB
TSKB 1.8 1.7 -0.7 1.8 5.5 5.5 JPL wrt COMB
SHAO 2.6 3.2 -3.1 3.4 6.6 13.1 JPL wrt COMB
YAR1 -3.6 2.2 4.8 2.7 -7.6 7.0 JPL wrt COMB
IRKT 1.7 1.7 -1.1 1.7 3.8 5.1 JPL wrt COMB
MALI -2.6 2.7 -2.4 4.6 13.8 9.2 JPL wrt COMB
WTZR 5.8 1.7 -0.7 1.7 0.9 5.1 JPL wrt COMB
ONSA 5.5 1.7 -1.4 1.6 -3.3 4.8 JPL wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER GFZ
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR GFZ 69.9
Transformation of loose solution GFZ to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 30 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 2.4 mm GFZ wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
3.1 1.3 -0.5 1.4 3.4 1.2 -0.213 0.197 GFZ CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for GFZ
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL 0.1 1.1 -1.1 1.2 -0.3 3.8 GFZ wrt COMB
FORT 2.3 1.8 0.7 2.3 16.9 7.4 GFZ wrt COMB
BRMU 1.6 1.1 -1.7 1.2 -4.5 4.2 GFZ wrt COMB
SANT 2.3 6.1 7.7 6.2 32.4 25.9 GFZ wrt COMB
AREQ 3.6 2.2 0.4 2.4 13.8 8.6 GFZ wrt COMB
WES2 1.5 1.0 -0.4 1.0 -5.3 3.6 GFZ wrt COMB
ALGO 0.5 1.1 -1.7 0.9 -4.0 3.5 GFZ wrt COMB
NLIB 2.3 1.1 1.4 1.0 -0.1 4.1 GFZ wrt COMB
MDO1 2.1 1.1 1.5 1.2 -5.0 4.7 GFZ wrt COMB
YELL -1.4 1.2 0.2 0.9 -6.5 3.7 GFZ wrt COMB
GOL2 2.2 1.1 1.2 1.2 1.7 4.2 GFZ wrt COMB
DRAO -0.6 1.1 1.2 1.0 -1.6 3.4 GFZ wrt COMB
FAIR -0.3 1.2 5.5 1.1 -6.7 3.9 GFZ wrt COMB
KOKB -1.2 1.5 0.1 2.3 -5.5 6.1 GFZ wrt COMB
KWJ1 -2.1 1.8 -3.4 2.5 26.1 7.0 GFZ wrt COMB
MAC1 0.0 5.0 -0.8 4.0 -1.4 16.6 GFZ wrt COMB
TID2 4.2 1.8 -2.1 2.1 -4.0 5.2 GFZ wrt COMB
HOB2 3.0 4.4 -0.7 3.9 -13.1 16.0 GFZ wrt COMB
GUAM -1.4 1.9 1.1 2.6 17.4 8.1 GFZ wrt COMB
TSKB -2.9 1.4 1.3 1.5 6.4 4.7 GFZ wrt COMB
YAR1 3.2 2.4 0.6 2.9 -8.8 9.4 GFZ wrt COMB
IRKT -2.3 1.3 0.6 1.3 -4.4 3.8 GFZ wrt COMB
DAV1 3.5 6.7 0.5 5.9 4.2 22.3 GFZ wrt COMB
KIT3 -2.2 2.2 3.9 2.2 -6.0 8.5 GFZ wrt COMB
MALI -3.0 2.3 -1.5 3.1 23.1 9.1 GFZ wrt COMB
ZWEN 1.2 1.1 -0.3 1.0 -0.2 3.6 GFZ wrt COMB
MATE -0.3 1.1 -1.5 1.1 -8.2 4.0 GFZ wrt COMB
POTS 0.1 1.1 -2.3 1.0 -9.5 3.7 GFZ wrt COMB
WTZR -0.9 1.2 -1.7 1.0 -7.8 3.9 GFZ wrt COMB
ONSA -1.4 1.3 -1.3 1.0 -8.8 3.9 GFZ wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER COD
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR COD 47.55
Transformation of loose solution COD to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 36 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 1.8 mm COD wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
-8.1 2.9 6.2 2.7 -19.8 4.2 -1.191 0.154 COD CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for COD
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL 0.1 0.8 0.0 1.0 -1.4 3.0 COD wrt COMB
FORT -1.7 1.5 -3.5 2.9 -12.0 6.2 COD wrt COMB
KOUR -1.1 1.3 -3.4 2.3 7.9 8.2 COD wrt COMB
BRMU -1.0 0.7 1.2 1.0 5.1 3.3 COD wrt COMB
SANT 1.9 2.0 -4.2 3.4 -22.4 7.2 COD wrt COMB
AREQ 0.8 1.8 2.1 5.0 -18.1 7.9 COD wrt COMB
WES2 -1.2 0.6 1.0 0.8 1.1 2.4 COD wrt COMB
GODE -0.9 0.6 1.0 0.9 6.9 3.0 COD wrt COMB
ALGO -1.0 0.6 1.4 0.7 3.4 2.4 COD wrt COMB
NLIB -0.8 0.6 0.1 0.8 2.5 3.0 COD wrt COMB
MDO1 -1.3 0.8 0.5 1.0 10.0 3.5 COD wrt COMB
PIE1 -1.0 0.7 0.4 1.0 6.2 3.3 COD wrt COMB
YELL -0.1 0.8 -0.1 0.7 5.5 2.5 COD wrt COMB
GOLD -0.9 0.8 0.0 1.0 4.8 3.1 COD wrt COMB
DRAO -0.9 0.7 -0.2 0.8 5.3 2.4 COD wrt COMB
FAIR -0.8 0.8 -1.3 1.0 1.4 2.7 COD wrt COMB
KOKB -3.2 1.5 0.7 2.8 -11.0 5.5 COD wrt COMB
KWJ1 1.1 1.7 4.4 3.6 2.5 7.0 COD wrt COMB
MAC1 -0.3 3.1 0.1 3.2 9.4 13.7 COD wrt COMB
TIDB 0.6 1.2 0.2 2.1 -6.3 3.7 COD wrt COMB
HOB2 -0.1 2.3 0.1 2.6 -1.3 11.3 COD wrt COMB
GUAM 0.8 1.7 -2.2 3.5 -0.7 8.0 COD wrt COMB
TSKB -0.2 1.2 -1.4 1.7 -3.8 3.9 COD wrt COMB
SHAO -0.7 1.2 -1.9 1.8 2.8 3.9 COD wrt COMB
PERT 0.8 1.2 -1.9 2.0 -12.9 4.3 COD wrt COMB
YAR1 1.1 1.2 -1.6 2.1 -15.9 4.0 COD wrt COMB
IRKT -2.1 1.1 1.4 1.4 6.4 3.1 COD wrt COMB
DAV1 0.1 7.2 1.4 6.4 30.7 21.9 COD wrt COMB
KIT3 -1.9 1.3 0.8 1.8 5.6 7.5 COD wrt COMB
MALI 2.2 2.0 -0.9 4.5 -3.5 7.6 COD wrt COMB
ZWEN -1.0 0.8 1.8 0.9 2.3 2.7 COD wrt COMB
MATE -0.1 0.8 0.9 1.0 -0.5 3.3 COD wrt COMB
GRAZ -0.2 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.1 2.7 COD wrt COMB
POTS 0.0 0.8 1.3 0.8 3.1 2.8 COD wrt COMB
WTZR -0.2 0.8 1.1 0.9 0.8 3.0 COD wrt COMB
ONSA -0.1 0.8 1.6 0.8 1.3 2.6 COD wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER SIO
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR SIO 2.512
Transformation of loose solution SIO to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 31 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 3.1 mm SIO wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
8.0 7.1 -8.4 6.6 -186.2 22.0 -1.027 0.267 SIO CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for SIO
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -0.9 1.5 -3.5 2.6 -1.6 4.7 SIO wrt COMB
FORT -6.6 2.5 2.1 5.8 8.3 8.1 SIO wrt COMB
KOUR -2.3 2.4 -0.9 6.3 2.5 11.7 SIO wrt COMB
BRMU -0.4 1.3 0.3 3.1 -3.8 5.5 SIO wrt COMB
SANT -9.3 3.4 2.1 7.2 -8.2 10.3 SIO wrt COMB
AREQ -1.3 3.3 2.6 9.9 -8.5 14.5 SIO wrt COMB
WES2 0.3 1.2 1.5 2.6 8.8 3.6 SIO wrt COMB
GODE -0.6 1.3 -0.6 2.9 -12.2 4.9 SIO wrt COMB
ALGO 0.9 1.0 -0.5 2.0 2.6 3.0 SIO wrt COMB
NLIB 1.7 1.3 0.7 2.7 -5.8 4.9 SIO wrt COMB
MDO1 4.5 1.4 -3.9 3.1 -8.3 5.3 SIO wrt COMB
PIE1 3.9 1.4 -2.0 3.0 0.6 5.2 SIO wrt COMB
YELL 1.0 1.6 1.5 2.4 7.5 4.4 SIO wrt COMB
GOL2 3.4 1.3 1.4 2.5 -1.1 4.1 SIO wrt COMB
DRAO 4.8 1.2 -0.3 2.0 -1.6 3.1 SIO wrt COMB
FAIR 3.8 1.7 1.2 2.6 -1.9 4.5 SIO wrt COMB
KOKB 8.6 2.1 3.8 3.5 12.6 5.2 SIO wrt COMB
KWJ1 -3.6 2.3 4.9 5.1 -25.4 8.4 SIO wrt COMB
GUAM -7.1 2.3 1.8 5.2 -15.0 9.4 SIO wrt COMB
TSKB -1.8 1.9 -1.7 3.4 -15.9 8.9 SIO wrt COMB
SHAO -1.3 2.0 2.3 3.7 1.5 5.6 SIO wrt COMB
PERT -2.4 2.3 -1.9 4.2 27.7 7.0 SIO wrt COMB
IRKT 0.4 2.0 0.6 3.0 13.8 4.3 SIO wrt COMB
KIT3 2.5 1.9 2.9 3.6 -6.8 6.4 SIO wrt COMB
ZWEN 2.7 1.4 -0.8 2.2 -6.6 3.6 SIO wrt COMB
MATE 1.0 1.5 -0.2 2.6 -5.2 5.0 SIO wrt COMB
GRAZ 1.9 1.5 -1.6 2.6 -4.2 6.4 SIO wrt COMB
POTS 2.4 1.3 -2.2 2.1 -5.5 4.2 SIO wrt COMB
WTZR 2.4 1.3 -2.6 2.0 -3.7 3.7 SIO wrt COMB
ONSA 2.3 1.3 -4.3 1.8 0.1 3.0 SIO wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
CENTER NGS
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR NGS 169.6
Transformation of loose solution NGS to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 34 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 4.3 mm NGS wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
9.3 13.7 -6.6 14.1 -160.7 48.6 -2.325 0.747 NGS CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for NGS
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -0.2 4.0 8.4 6.1 9.1 8.5 NGS wrt COMB
FORT -0.7 8.1 -13.9 17.5 -39.9 23.2 NGS wrt COMB
KOUR -2.4 5.4 -7.1 10.2 -24.5 15.2 NGS wrt COMB
BRMU 0.5 3.0 -0.5 5.2 -7.2 7.0 NGS wrt COMB
AREQ -10.6 9.9 -16.4 21.9 17.9 25.4 NGS wrt COMB
WES2 2.8 3.0 1.3 4.4 -9.9 5.7 NGS wrt COMB
GODE 1.2 2.8 -0.7 4.3 -2.4 6.3 NGS wrt COMB
ALGO 3.1 2.9 0.6 4.1 -2.9 5.7 NGS wrt COMB
NLIB -0.9 2.7 3.4 4.2 0.0 6.6 NGS wrt COMB
MDO1 -5.4 2.9 -0.5 4.9 -10.9 8.8 NGS wrt COMB
PIE1 -4.0 2.9 1.4 4.8 -13.5 8.1 NGS wrt COMB
YELL 4.7 3.4 2.8 4.7 -2.4 6.7 NGS wrt COMB
GOLD -3.2 3.1 5.5 5.1 -11.1 8.1 NGS wrt COMB
DRAO 2.5 3.0 2.2 4.6 -5.9 6.5 NGS wrt COMB
FAIR 8.8 3.6 -4.3 4.9 3.8 6.7 NGS wrt COMB
KOKB -2.3 5.8 9.9 10.2 -2.1 15.2 NGS wrt COMB
KWJ1 -0.3 6.9 8.1 12.7 -38.0 19.7 NGS wrt COMB
TIDB -6.4 8.7 12.6 13.9 6.3 13.5 NGS wrt COMB
GUAM 2.3 5.1 -3.6 9.6 -19.7 14.6 NGS wrt COMB
TSKB 4.4 4.1 -7.7 6.4 8.6 7.9 NGS wrt COMB
SHAO 2.3 4.2 -3.5 6.7 1.4 7.8 NGS wrt COMB
PERT -7.0 7.7 -6.7 12.5 5.1 13.0 NGS wrt COMB
YAR1 -5.1 7.1 -6.6 12.3 -3.1 13.2 NGS wrt COMB
IRKT 2.9 3.7 5.0 5.6 3.0 6.2 NGS wrt COMB
KIT3 5.6 4.2 3.3 6.7 4.3 12.1 NGS wrt COMB
ZWEN 4.3 2.7 1.0 3.9 10.1 7.1 NGS wrt COMB
TROM 2.7 3.3 -2.7 4.0 6.3 7.1 NGS wrt COMB
MATE 1.8 3.6 6.2 5.2 15.6 8.6 NGS wrt COMB
GRAZ 1.9 3.1 3.8 4.6 14.5 7.8 NGS wrt COMB
POTS 1.8 2.9 1.2 4.3 9.6 7.5 NGS wrt COMB
WTZR 1.8 3.1 2.6 4.6 13.3 7.8 NGS wrt COMB
ONSA 1.5 3.0 -1.3 4.2 11.1 7.9 NGS wrt COMB
NYAL 1.8 4.3 -1.8 5.0 6.0 10.0 NGS wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
MADR 0.2 4.1 8.4 6.2 10.7 9.1 NGS wrt COMB
CENTER ESA
-------------------
VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR ESA 7.296
Transformation of loose solution ESA to COMB
-----------------------------------------------
For 27 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation 5.4 mm ESA wrt COMB
X-tran +- Y-tran +- Z-tran +- Scale +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (ppb) (ppb)
11.7 9.0 9.0 9.0 -2.2 8.1 -2.442 0.535 ESA CoM
Adjustments to core site positions for ESA
SITE dNorth +- dEast +- dUp +-
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
VILL -6.0 2.5 7.3 4.9 -1.4 7.2 ESA wrt COMB
FORT -3.8 4.5 -12.0 16.9 -23.2 17.8 ESA wrt COMB
KOUR -3.2 3.9 7.6 20.0 3.2 17.2 ESA wrt COMB
BRMU -5.0 2.3 1.4 6.9 11.7 7.5 ESA wrt COMB
SANT 13.7 7.1 -8.6 20.1 10.9 25.4 ESA wrt COMB
AREQ 4.7 6.2 -19.8 34.7 28.3 30.3 ESA wrt COMB
ALGO -1.0 2.4 5.0 4.7 -2.3 6.4 ESA wrt COMB
NLIB -0.2 2.6 1.7 5.8 -6.2 7.7 ESA wrt COMB
YELL 5.4 3.1 -4.5 4.4 -1.9 7.1 ESA wrt COMB
GOLD 3.3 3.0 6.4 5.3 10.9 8.9 ESA wrt COMB
FAIR 1.5 3.3 -9.0 4.8 23.0 8.2 ESA wrt COMB
KOKB 6.2 4.6 1.5 8.4 6.1 14.7 ESA wrt COMB
KWJ1 9.4 5.4 3.9 20.6 -11.7 22.6 ESA wrt COMB
TIDB 1.6 4.7 -6.2 7.5 -24.0 9.9 ESA wrt COMB
TSKB -4.9 3.3 17.7 6.4 6.6 7.7 ESA wrt COMB
SHAO -4.3 3.2 15.8 7.1 0.3 8.5 ESA wrt COMB
PERT 4.5 3.6 -17.2 7.6 3.0 11.1 ESA wrt COMB
YAR1 4.2 3.5 -15.7 8.0 12.3 11.2 ESA wrt COMB
IRKT -1.1 3.2 10.9 4.9 -28.1 6.4 ESA wrt COMB
KIT3 -2.4 3.9 -0.1 9.1 12.2 13.8 ESA wrt COMB
ZWEN 1.0 2.3 -3.9 3.6 -8.1 6.1 ESA wrt COMB
TROM 0.2 2.5 2.4 3.3 -7.9 7.2 ESA wrt COMB
MATE -5.2 2.6 -3.8 5.2 10.2 8.5 ESA wrt COMB
POTS -2.9 2.2 -0.3 3.7 2.2 6.3 ESA wrt COMB
WTZR -3.8 2.2 -0.8 3.8 5.5 6.5 ESA wrt COMB
ONSA 1.0 2.5 2.4 4.0 -1.6 7.9 ESA wrt COMB
NYAL 4.1 4.0 -0.5 4.7 -17.0 14.3 ESA wrt COMB
Reference sites NOT used
5.0 EOP ESIMATES FROM THE CONSTRAINED COMBINED SOLUTION
MJD Xpole Ypole UT1-UTC LOD Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt Xrtsig Yrtsig XYcorr XUTcor YUTcor
(10**-6") (0.1 usec) (10**-6") (0.1 usec) (10**-6"/d) (10**-6"/d)
51251.50 55662 240485 6403470 10633 55 55 66667 54 138 40 0 -1660 -686 68 66 -.051 .000 .000
51252.50 54017 240004 6391861 12594 52 53 66667 48 138 40 0 -1629 -277 55 53 -.059 .000 .000
51253.50 52279 239639 6378517 14061 52 53 66667 47 138 40 0 -1848 -454 53 51 -.060 .000 .000
51254.50 50662 239067 6363764 15378 52 53 66667 47 138 40 0 -1385 -689 54 53 -.060 .000 .000
51255.50 49592 239029 6347920 16230 52 53 66667 46 138 40 0 -755 613 53 52 -.064 .000 .000
51256.50 48850 239533 6331357 16817 52 53 66667 48 138 40 0 -729 394 53 53 -.064 .000 .000
51257.50 48076 240006 6314639 16529 53 55 66667 55 150 40 0 -819 552 61 61 -.058 .000 .000
[Mailed From: Tom Herring <tah at mtglas.mit.edu>]
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list