[IGSREPORT-4065] Wk 0917 MIT T2 Analysis Report

Thomas Thomas
Mon Aug 25 13:26:54 PDT 1997


******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report    Mon Aug 25 13:26:54 PDT 1997      Message Number 4065
******************************************************************************

Author: Thomas Herring
Subject: Wk 0917 MIT T2 Analysis Report

********************************************************************************
MIT ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0917    Dates: 97aug03  to  97aug09 
********************************************************************************

MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) 
Room 54-618
77 Massachusetts Avenue, 
Cambridge,  MA  02139
e-mail: tah at mtglas.mit.edu 
tel:    (617)253-5941 (Tom Herring)
fax:    (617)253-1699

PRODUCTS GENERATED:
The following products are generated and uploaded into CDDIS @ NASA/GSFC
   MIT0917g.SNX   Combined sinex file from all available analysis centers
   MIT0917g.SUM   Name of this summary file

0.0 Starting Week 0901 we started using a new apriori file not Non-ITRF94 coordinates
    based on the analysis of week 0822-0900 sinex files.

1.0 Analysis Procedures:

(1) Each centers sinex solutions are de-constrained before
 combination.  Due to numerical stability different new constraints
 are applied to different centers (see center report below):
 
(2) Covariance matrices from each center are re-scaled to generate
 unit increment in chi square per degree in the tight constraints solution.
 The values are are based in the chi**2 per degree of freedom increment
 when the loosely constrained solution is constrained to the ITRF1994
 coordinates of the 13 core sites.  Orientation changes are estimated
 in this step, but translations and scale are NOT estimated.
 
(3) The tight solution is generated with the following constraints on
 the core sites.  Starting Week 0858, ITRF94 is used for the coordinate
 system.  Starting Week 0878, we changed the site selection here to use
 WTZR and GOL2.  Starting Week 0897 we stopped using MADR as a core site.
           Sig N Sig E Sig U
           (m)    (m)   (m)
     TROM  0.004 0.004 0.004 
X    MADR  0.003 0.003 0.003 
     KOSG  0.003 0.003 0.005 
     WTZR  0.002 0.002 0.003 
     HART  0.004 0.004 0.004 
     ALGO  0.003 0.003 0.003 
     YELL  0.003 0.003 0.004  
     GOLD  0.004 0.004 0.005 
     GOL2  0.004 0.004 0.005 
     FAIR  0.003 0.003 0.003 
     KOKB  0.003 0.003 0.003  
     SANT  0.004 0.004 0.004  
     TIDB  0.004 0.004 0.004 
     YAR1  0.004 0.004 0.005  

Earth rotation parameters are estimated for each center (even when not given
in the original SINEX files.  In this case the partial derivatives are
computed from the station coordinates).

(4) Individual Center comments:  As a reminder we include here the
    position changes being applied to different centers because their
    ARP heights do not match the current station logs (or the values
    used by the majority of centers.  These were reported in 
    0.0 IMPORTANT NOTE Previously.)
NOTE: Starting Wk0895 we adopted the station log height for
      IISC  0.0780 m (Previous value was 0.0000)
      MDVO  0.1456 m (Previous value was 0.1493)
EMR: (a) Constraints loosened to +-5 m for positions
     (b) Station postitions being changed.
         Site  TAHI  NEU (m)  0.0  0.0  -0.0320 (Real 1.055 EMR 1.023)
JPL: (a) Constraints not changed.  No constraints given SINEX file but
     appear to be about 1 meter of the core sites.
     (b) Station postitions being changed.  
         Site  iisc  NEU (m)  0.0  0.00  1.2358
         Site  moin  NEU (m)  0.0  0.00 -1.0969 start Wk 0881/0893
         (MOIN has no station log.  The adopted height is from the rinex file)
         Site  ankr  NEU (m) 0.0    0.0  -0.0009 
         Site  bahr  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0  0.0813
         Site  braz  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0072
         Site  cro1  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.1143
         Site  fair  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0032 
         Site  hart  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0329
         Site  irkt  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0359
         Site  kokb  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0013
         Site  mkea  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0009
         Site  ohig  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0018
         Site  sant  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0013
         Site  thu1  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0009
         Site  usud  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0  0.0311
         Site  wuhn  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0  0.0341
         Site  mdvo  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.0938
         Site  xian  NEU (m)  0.0    0.0 -0.3840 

GFZ: (a) Constraints loosened to +-5 m for positions.
COD: (a) Constraints loosened to +-5 m for positions.
SIO: (a) Constraints not changed since the center's constraints are 
     extremely weak.
NGS: (a) Constraints loosened to +-1 m for positions.
     (b) Station positions being changed: NONe
ESA: (a) Constraints not changed since the center's constraints are
     very loose (1000m)
     (b) Station positions being changed:
         dgar   0.00 0.00 -0.0814 NEU  (Real 0.0814, ESA 0.0000)
         wuhn   0.00 0.00  0.0350 NEU  (Real 2.3200, ESA 2.3550)
     
(5) When the combined and center solutions are compared to ITRF94, the
heights are given a variance 10 times larger than the horizontal coordinates.
The same variance ratio is used when the RMS to ITRF94 core sites is
computed.

(6) Starting Week 0826, we show the differences in the coordinates for
five non-core sites, in remote areas.  Four of these sites are processed 
by all centers.  These sites are not used in the RMS calculations or 
the transformation estimation to the 13 core sites.  The change in procedure
was because FORT is no longer being processed by all centers.  AREQ has
been added to the list for this reason.

(7) Starting Week 0826, we start to show a comparison of each centers
results with the combined solution for the week.  When the constraints
are applied to loose combined solution to translate, rotate and scale it
to the ITRF94, the constraints are actually applied using the full 
covariance matrix of the combined solution (rather than simply directly
applying the transformations to the coordinates).  The approach we use
constrains the center of mass to have zero variance relative to ITRF94.
The result of this is that the combined solution has the same center
of mass position and scale as ITRF94, and therefore when each of the
centers are compared to the combined solution, they generate very similar
translations and scales as they do the ITRF94.  Had we simply applied
the transformations to the coordinates, the translations and scale would
have been the difference between the combined translations and scale and
the individual center's translations and scale.
This new section is numbered 4.0.

(8) Starting Week 868, we updated the coordinates of sites not included
in the ITRF94 coordinate files.  This introduces a discontinuity in the
the adjustments to some of the "isolated" sites shown below.
 
 2.0 COMBINED FIT TO ITRF 1994
 Transformation of loose solution COMBINED to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    9 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   4.3 mm  COMBINED wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   -7.8    2.6     22.0    2.7    -43.4    2.6  -1.537  0.744  COMBINED  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for COMBINED
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 ALGO    -1.8    0.3    8.8    0.5  -13.7    1.4  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 YELL     0.6    0.3    2.5    0.3   -2.4    1.5  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 GOLD     0.4    0.3   -8.4    0.5    2.9    1.9  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     4.3    0.4    9.5    0.4   -7.2    2.0  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 KOKB    -3.2    0.5   -6.2    0.8  -12.1    2.6  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 TIDB     4.9    0.3   -3.1    0.6   -3.0    1.9  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 YAR1    -9.9    0.3    6.1    0.6   11.0    2.1  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 WTZR     7.4    0.3    0.4    0.4   10.1    1.5  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 KOSG     3.8    0.3   -3.0    0.4   14.5    1.3  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR   -13.2    0.5   39.4    1.0  -35.3    2.0  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     7.1    1.0   12.2    1.5  -11.6    2.7  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 AREQ    30.8    1.7    7.3    3.6  -25.7    8.4  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 MCM4     4.4    1.0   -6.1    1.0  -72.3    2.5  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 GUAM    -0.8    0.7   16.5    1.3   27.2    2.6  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 KIT3     3.0    0.7   11.7    0.9   21.5    1.7  COMBINED wrt ITRF94
 
 
 3.0 CENTER FITS TO ITRF 1994
 CENTER EMR
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR EMR 15.8
 
 Transformation of loose solution EMR to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   7.5 mm  EMR wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   10.7    3.8    109.8    3.9   -172.7    4.0  -1.275  1.210  EMR  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for EMR
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT   -19.4    6.5   -4.3   11.5   -9.9   24.0  EMR wrt ITRF94
 ALGO     6.1    3.0   13.2    5.7   -2.2    8.5  EMR wrt ITRF94
 YELL     3.3    2.8    7.0    4.2    2.7    9.1  EMR wrt ITRF94
 GOLD    11.9    3.0   -2.5    6.2   -7.4   10.7  EMR wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     7.3    3.6    7.5    5.2  -27.5   11.8  EMR wrt ITRF94
 KOKB    -2.2    5.2   -9.2   10.7  -44.3   20.1  EMR wrt ITRF94
 TIDB    -6.0    5.0    1.0    9.6   14.1   15.4  EMR wrt ITRF94
 YAR1   -13.5    4.2   11.9   12.3   29.1   20.8  EMR wrt ITRF94
 WTZR    19.0    4.2   -6.9    6.0   22.4   11.3  EMR wrt ITRF94
 KOSG    12.7    3.8  -13.4    5.6   23.3   10.9  EMR wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR    -2.8    4.5   69.0    8.8   -8.9   13.1  EMR wrt ITRF94
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    12.5    7.0   18.5   11.9  -92.0   22.4  EMR wrt ITRF94
 AREQ    26.1    8.1   -0.8   22.6  -32.8   35.7  EMR wrt ITRF94
 MCM4     9.5   10.0  -37.0    9.9  -16.5   18.8  EMR wrt ITRF94
 GUAM    -9.2    5.7   30.7   21.3   31.1   19.3  EMR wrt ITRF94
 KIT3    15.9    6.2    4.5   10.1   10.6   12.6  EMR wrt ITRF94
 
 CENTER JPL
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR JPL 9.7
 
 Transformation of loose solution JPL to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    7 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   3.3 mm  JPL wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   11.9    5.0     32.3    5.2    -33.1    2.9  -1.781  0.683  JPL  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for JPL
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 ALGO     1.1    0.7    6.5    0.8   -3.2    4.0  JPL wrt ITRF94
 YELL     0.7    0.8   -0.1    0.6    1.9    4.5  JPL wrt ITRF94
 GOL2     3.2    0.7  -10.1    0.8   10.9    4.4  JPL wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     1.8    1.0    8.5    0.7  -10.6    5.5  JPL wrt ITRF94
 KOKB    -5.1    0.7    0.4    0.8    4.9    5.0  JPL wrt ITRF94
 WTZR     1.6    0.7    1.8    0.5   -0.6    3.8  JPL wrt ITRF94
 KOSG    -0.1    0.7   -2.2    0.5   -3.2    3.8  JPL wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR   -19.1    1.2   39.8    2.3  -32.7    6.1  JPL wrt ITRF94
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     6.8    2.3   -2.0    2.8  -33.1    7.9  JPL wrt ITRF94
 MCM4     5.7    4.7   23.4    4.3  -62.8    7.9  JPL wrt ITRF94
 GUAM   -11.3    2.1   20.2    2.8    3.8    6.5  JPL wrt ITRF94
 KIT3    -8.6    2.6   11.6    2.6   10.3   13.1  JPL wrt ITRF94
 
 CENTER GFZ
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR GFZ 23.3
 
 Transformation of loose solution GFZ to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   7.1 mm  GFZ wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   -1.7    3.6     -0.4    3.6    -76.0    3.8  -2.461  1.142  GFZ  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for GFZ
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    -8.0    3.1  -14.4    5.7    6.1   14.7  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 ALGO    -0.6    1.7   15.4    3.3  -14.5    6.5  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 YELL     0.4    1.6    7.1    2.4   -2.3    7.1  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 GOL2     1.6    1.6  -11.8    3.5    1.7    7.5  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     4.3    1.8   19.2    2.9    1.5    9.0  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 KOKB    -3.0    2.7   -0.3    6.4    3.7   13.7  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 TIDB     4.0    2.1    1.4    3.2   -8.2    7.7  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 YAR1   -13.6    1.8  -10.9    2.8    1.6    7.7  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 WTZR    14.0    2.1    8.3    2.7    9.0    6.8  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 KOSG     9.6    1.9    4.5    2.6    1.5    6.7  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    11.8    3.3   10.6    6.2  -64.5   11.7  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 AREQ    29.4    5.9   -4.3   18.0  -18.2   28.9  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 MCM4    11.0    4.2  -11.7    4.6   -6.0   11.5  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 GUAM     3.0    2.5   36.8    5.8   40.5    9.2  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 KIT3     4.0    3.2   25.5    5.0    4.9   24.8  GFZ wrt ITRF94
 
 CENTER COD
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR COD 18.555
 
 Transformation of loose solution COD to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    9 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   4.7 mm  COD wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
  -11.0    2.8      4.6    3.0    -34.0    2.9  -2.401  0.812  COD  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for COD
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 ALGO    -1.5    0.6    7.1    0.9  -19.3    2.8  COD wrt ITRF94
 YELL    -0.4    0.6    1.9    0.5  -10.6    2.9  COD wrt ITRF94
 GOLD     1.3    0.5   -9.5    0.7   -0.5    3.4  COD wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     2.4    0.7    9.7    0.7   -2.7    3.9  COD wrt ITRF94
 KOKB     0.3    1.0   -3.5    1.7  -23.2    5.0  COD wrt ITRF94
 TIDB     4.8    0.6   -1.0    1.3  -13.0    3.6  COD wrt ITRF94
 YAR1   -10.0    0.6    4.4    1.2   39.0    5.5  COD wrt ITRF94
 WTZR     7.4    0.7    0.0    0.7   17.0    3.1  COD wrt ITRF94
 KOSG     3.5    0.6   -3.2    0.7   13.5    2.9  COD wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     9.5    2.0   14.9    3.6  -37.2    6.2  COD wrt ITRF94
 AREQ    37.9    2.9    2.2    7.2  -17.3   11.5  COD wrt ITRF94
 MCM4     1.3    2.1    5.7    2.3  -17.4    5.6  COD wrt ITRF94
 GUAM     2.6    1.4   34.0    2.7   30.4    5.3  COD wrt ITRF94
 KIT3     8.4    1.4   11.5    1.6   17.1    3.4  COD wrt ITRF94
 
 CENTER SIO
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR SIO 1.105
 
 Transformation of loose solution SIO to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   5.2 mm  SIO wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
    3.4    2.6     41.8    2.6   -120.7    2.8  -0.114  0.830  SIO  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for SIO
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    -9.7    2.1    1.0    3.4    7.7    6.3  SIO wrt ITRF94
 ALGO    -0.6    1.0   10.9    1.9   -2.7    2.7  SIO wrt ITRF94
 YELL     1.0    1.0    2.2    1.4   11.3    2.9  SIO wrt ITRF94
 GOLD     2.6    1.0  -14.0    2.1    1.3    3.3  SIO wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     6.4    1.1   10.5    1.7  -10.1    3.6  SIO wrt ITRF94
 KOKB    -0.5    1.6   -5.3    2.9   -3.7    5.6  SIO wrt ITRF94
 TIDB     0.5    1.2   -2.1    2.0  -16.2    3.5  SIO wrt ITRF94
 YAR1   -11.1    1.1    7.0    1.9   -9.1    3.4  SIO wrt ITRF94
 WTZR     8.8    1.2   -0.8    1.6    2.3    3.0  SIO wrt ITRF94
 KOSG     5.9    1.1   -2.5    1.5   19.3    2.5  SIO wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR   -11.9    1.4   32.9    2.0  -36.5    3.0  SIO wrt ITRF94
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     4.8    2.1   17.2    3.5   20.9    3.9  SIO wrt ITRF94
 AREQ    20.1    6.8    6.8   21.2  -38.2   24.9  SIO wrt ITRF94
 MCM4    -2.7    2.6   -5.4    3.0 -123.7    3.8  SIO wrt ITRF94
 GUAM    -2.3    1.7   21.6    3.4   27.4    4.9  SIO wrt ITRF94
 KIT3    -1.2    1.8   12.6    2.4   22.7    2.7  SIO wrt ITRF94
 
 CENTER NGS
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR NGS 217
 
 Transformation of loose solution NGS to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    9 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   9.0 mm  NGS wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   25.9    5.5    202.6    5.1   -169.2    5.5  -0.845  1.546  NGS  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for NGS
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    51.7   13.8  -20.6   20.1    4.6   28.0  NGS wrt ITRF94
 ALGO    -9.0    5.3   14.9    8.4  -22.9    7.5  NGS wrt ITRF94
 YELL   -16.2    4.9   -7.5    6.3   -8.7    9.1  NGS wrt ITRF94
 GOLD    -7.5    4.7    4.9    8.6    6.7   11.4  NGS wrt ITRF94
 FAIR   -11.6    6.0    6.0    7.4  -28.7   12.7  NGS wrt ITRF94
 KOKB   -20.7    7.3   11.1   12.9  -21.3   16.7  NGS wrt ITRF94
 TIDB    29.5   11.4  -32.1   16.2   48.8   21.3  NGS wrt ITRF94
 WTZR    -9.9    6.6   16.5    8.7   12.5   14.7  NGS wrt ITRF94
 KOSG   -11.3    6.0   14.6    7.9    8.5   13.7  NGS wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR   -25.3    7.6   69.5    9.6  -38.5   15.2  NGS wrt ITRF94
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    43.7    9.7   14.8   18.4   -7.0   24.7  NGS wrt ITRF94
 MCM4    59.2   27.9  -69.9   27.7    5.6   17.4  NGS wrt ITRF94
 GUAM   -13.6   11.9   36.3   20.6   45.6   23.7  NGS wrt ITRF94
 
 CENTER ESA
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR ESA 4.416
 
 Transformation of loose solution ESA to ITRF94
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   5.8 mm  ESA wrt ITRF94 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
    3.3    2.9     25.0    3.0    -74.4    3.1  -2.046  0.930  ESA  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for ESA
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT     8.3    3.3    9.4    6.7   14.4   11.8  ESA wrt ITRF94
 ALGO    -3.6    1.6   16.6    3.1  -20.3    4.5  ESA wrt ITRF94
 YELL     1.9    1.3   -3.5    2.3  -14.1    4.4  ESA wrt ITRF94
 GOLD    -6.6    1.5  -13.3    3.6   -5.7    6.4  ESA wrt ITRF94
 FAIR     3.0    1.9   -1.1    2.8    9.0    6.2  ESA wrt ITRF94
 KOKB    -8.4    2.2   -9.2    4.4  -21.3    7.1  ESA wrt ITRF94
 TIDB    14.0    2.7    7.2    4.0   -5.0    8.9  ESA wrt ITRF94
 YAR1    -4.8    1.9    4.7    4.1    7.6    6.9  ESA wrt ITRF94
 WTZR     2.8    2.3   -5.5    2.9   17.2    4.9  ESA wrt ITRF94
 KOSG    -1.4    2.1   -7.1    2.7   18.1    4.8  ESA wrt ITRF94
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR   -13.3    2.6   45.7    4.2  -28.5    7.2  ESA wrt ITRF94
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    12.7    3.4   -0.7   10.6  -60.4    9.4  ESA wrt ITRF94
 AREQ    35.4    4.3    7.8   19.2   -8.7   21.4  ESA wrt ITRF94
 MCM4    15.7    5.8   20.8    5.3    1.9    7.7  ESA wrt ITRF94
 GUAM    -0.1    2.6   -0.8    8.3   51.3    7.5  ESA wrt ITRF94
 KIT3    -1.8    3.4    0.6    4.9   31.5    5.1  ESA wrt ITRF94
 
 
 4.0 CENTER FITS TO COMBINED SOLUTION 
 CENTER EMR
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR EMR 15.8
 
 Transformation of loose solution EMR to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   5.4 mm  EMR wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   10.3    2.7    107.3    2.8   -172.1    2.9  -1.183  0.862  EMR  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for EMR
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT   -15.1    6.5   -7.6   11.5    0.5   24.0  EMR wrt COMB
 ALGO     7.0    3.0    5.8    5.7    9.2    8.5  EMR wrt COMB
 YELL     2.2    2.8    5.0    4.2    3.2    9.1  EMR wrt COMB
 GOLD     9.9    3.0    6.8    6.2  -13.0   10.7  EMR wrt COMB
 FAIR     2.5    3.6   -1.9    5.2  -22.0   11.8  EMR wrt COMB
 KOKB    -0.8    5.2   -2.7   10.7  -34.2   20.1  EMR wrt COMB
 TIDB   -10.2    5.0    2.4    9.6   17.7   15.4  EMR wrt COMB
 YAR1    -1.3    4.2    5.3   12.3   18.8   20.8  EMR wrt COMB
 WTZR    11.5    4.2   -5.4    6.0   11.9   11.3  EMR wrt COMB
 KOSG     8.7    3.8   -8.6    5.6    8.1   10.9  EMR wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR    10.1    4.5   31.9    8.8   25.9   13.1  EMR wrt COMB
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     3.6    7.0   10.1   11.9  -81.3   22.4  EMR wrt COMB
 AREQ    -7.9    8.1   -4.8   22.6   -8.8   35.7  EMR wrt COMB
 MCM4     5.1   10.0  -35.1    9.9   56.2   18.8  EMR wrt COMB
 GUAM    -8.5    5.7   14.3   21.3    5.0   19.3  EMR wrt COMB
 KIT3    13.1    6.2   -5.2   10.1   -9.7   12.6  EMR wrt COMB
 
 CENTER JPL
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR JPL 9.7
 
 Transformation of loose solution JPL to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    7 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   1.4 mm  JPL wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
    2.3    2.2     15.5    2.2    -41.9    1.3  -1.215  0.294  JPL  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for JPL
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 ALGO     0.6    0.7    1.6    0.8    4.2    4.0  JPL wrt COMB
 YELL     0.4    0.8    0.7    0.6    0.5    4.5  JPL wrt COMB
 GOL2    -0.1    0.7   -0.4    0.8    5.7    4.4  JPL wrt COMB
 FAIR     0.6    1.0    1.5    0.7   -5.4    5.5  JPL wrt COMB
 KOKB    -1.2    0.7   -1.7    0.8    3.1    5.0  JPL wrt COMB
 WTZR     0.5    0.7    0.2    0.5    0.3    3.8  JPL wrt COMB
 KOSG     0.8    0.7   -0.4    0.5   -8.3    3.8  JPL wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR    -0.8    1.2    1.6    2.3   10.1    6.1  JPL wrt COMB
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    -0.6    2.3    0.6    2.8  -23.6    7.9  JPL wrt COMB
 MCM4     0.0    4.7   -4.2    4.3    2.3    7.9  JPL wrt COMB
 GUAM     3.1    2.1   -9.3    2.8  -19.7    6.5  JPL wrt COMB
 KIT3     2.7    2.6   -3.5    2.6    3.1   13.1  JPL wrt COMB
 
 CENTER GFZ
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR GFZ 23.3
 
 Transformation of loose solution GFZ to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   5.7 mm  GFZ wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   -2.2    2.8     -3.1    2.9    -75.3    3.1  -2.158  0.917  GFZ  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for GFZ
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    -4.0    3.1  -17.6    5.7   12.2   14.7  GFZ wrt COMB
 ALGO     0.4    1.7    8.1    3.3   -4.0    6.5  GFZ wrt COMB
 YELL    -0.5    1.6    5.1    2.4   -2.9    7.1  GFZ wrt COMB
 GOL2    -0.7    1.6   -2.5    3.5    9.0    7.5  GFZ wrt COMB
 FAIR    -0.4    1.8    9.9    2.9    5.4    9.0  GFZ wrt COMB
 KOKB    -1.5    2.7    6.2    6.4   10.2   13.7  GFZ wrt COMB
 TIDB    -0.4    2.1    2.5    3.2   -5.1    7.7  GFZ wrt COMB
 YAR1    -1.5    1.8  -17.6    2.8   -8.4    7.7  GFZ wrt COMB
 WTZR     6.4    2.1    9.8    2.7   -2.1    6.8  GFZ wrt COMB
 KOSG     5.5    1.9    9.4    2.6  -14.3    6.7  GFZ wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     3.0    3.3    2.7    6.2  -53.8   11.7  GFZ wrt COMB
 AREQ    -4.8    5.9   -8.2   18.0    5.9   28.9  GFZ wrt COMB
 MCM4     6.4    4.2  -10.0    4.6   66.8   11.5  GFZ wrt COMB
 GUAM     3.6    2.5   20.3    5.8   14.1    9.2  GFZ wrt COMB
 KIT3     1.1    3.2   15.5    5.0  -15.1   24.8  GFZ wrt COMB
 
 CENTER COD
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR COD 18.555
 
 Transformation of loose solution COD to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    9 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   2.0 mm  COD wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
  -11.0    1.2      4.6    1.3    -34.0    1.2  -2.403  0.346  COD  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for COD
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 ALGO     0.4    0.6   -1.7    0.9   -5.6    2.8  COD wrt COMB
 YELL    -1.0    0.6   -0.5    0.5   -8.2    2.9  COD wrt COMB
 GOLD     0.8    0.5   -1.1    0.7   -3.4    3.4  COD wrt COMB
 FAIR    -1.9    0.7    0.1    0.7    4.4    3.9  COD wrt COMB
 KOKB     3.5    1.0    2.6    1.7  -11.1    5.0  COD wrt COMB
 TIDB    -0.2    0.6    2.1    1.3   -9.9    3.6  COD wrt COMB
 YAR1    -0.1    0.6   -1.8    1.2   28.1    5.5  COD wrt COMB
 WTZR    -0.1    0.7   -0.4    0.7    6.9    3.1  COD wrt COMB
 KOSG    -0.4    0.6   -0.2    0.7   -1.1    2.9  COD wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     2.5    2.0    2.7    3.6  -25.6    6.2  COD wrt COMB
 AREQ     7.1    2.9   -5.0    7.2    8.4   11.5  COD wrt COMB
 MCM4    -3.1    2.1   11.7    2.3   54.9    5.6  COD wrt COMB
 GUAM     3.4    1.4   17.4    2.7    3.2    5.3  COD wrt COMB
 KIT3     5.4    1.4   -0.2    1.6   -4.4    3.4  COD wrt COMB
 
 CENTER SIO
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR SIO 1.105
 
 Transformation of loose solution SIO to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   3.0 mm  SIO wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
    3.0    1.5     39.3    1.5   -120.1    1.6  -0.022  0.478  SIO  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for SIO
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    -5.4    2.1   -2.3    3.4   18.0    6.3  SIO wrt COMB
 ALGO     0.3    1.0    3.5    1.9    8.5    2.7  SIO wrt COMB
 YELL    -0.1    1.0    0.2    1.4   11.6    2.9  SIO wrt COMB
 GOLD     0.6    1.0   -4.6    2.1   -4.4    3.3  SIO wrt COMB
 FAIR     1.6    1.1    1.2    1.7   -4.8    3.6  SIO wrt COMB
 KOKB     1.1    1.6    1.2    2.9    6.0    5.6  SIO wrt COMB
 TIDB    -3.8    1.2   -0.9    2.0  -12.5    3.5  SIO wrt COMB
 YAR1     1.0    1.1    0.5    1.9  -18.6    3.4  SIO wrt COMB
 WTZR     1.3    1.2    0.6    1.6   -8.1    3.0  SIO wrt COMB
 KOSG     2.0    1.1    2.2    1.5    4.3    2.5  SIO wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR     1.1    1.4   -4.2    2.0   -1.6    3.0  SIO wrt COMB
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    -4.0    2.1    9.0    3.5   31.5    3.9  SIO wrt COMB
 AREQ   -13.8    6.8    2.8   21.2  -14.5   24.9  SIO wrt COMB
 MCM4    -7.2    2.6   -3.6    3.0  -50.9    3.8  SIO wrt COMB
 GUAM    -1.5    1.7    5.4    3.4    0.8    4.9  SIO wrt COMB
 KIT3    -3.9    1.8    2.6    2.4    2.5    2.7  SIO wrt COMB
 
 CENTER NGS
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR NGS 217
 
 Transformation of loose solution NGS to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For    9 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation  10.0 mm  NGS wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
   23.9    6.1    197.1    5.7   -173.1    6.2  -0.437  1.718  NGS  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for NGS
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    52.2   13.8  -20.7   20.1    5.5   28.0  NGS wrt COMB
 ALGO    -8.1    5.3    7.4    8.4  -11.2    7.5  NGS wrt COMB
 YELL   -16.5    4.9   -8.1    6.3   -7.4    9.1  NGS wrt COMB
 GOLD    -8.8    4.7   14.4    8.6   -0.4   11.4  NGS wrt COMB
 FAIR   -14.3    6.0   -2.2    7.4  -22.5   12.7  NGS wrt COMB
 KOKB   -16.5    7.3   16.2   12.9  -13.0   16.7  NGS wrt COMB
 TIDB    30.2   11.4  -37.2   16.2   47.9   21.3  NGS wrt COMB
 WTZR   -13.6    6.6   15.6    8.7    4.6   14.7  NGS wrt COMB
 KOSG   -12.1    6.0   16.7    7.9   -4.1   13.7  NGS wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR    -9.3    7.6   30.1    9.6   -1.9   15.2  NGS wrt COMB
 Additional Sites 
 FORT    35.4    9.7    9.1   18.4    1.3   24.7  NGS wrt COMB
 MCM4    53.5   27.9  -75.5   27.7   72.0   17.4  NGS wrt COMB
 GUAM    -6.2   11.9   17.2   20.6   19.8   23.7  NGS wrt COMB
 
 CENTER ESA
 -------------------
 VARIANCE RESCALING FACTOR FOR ESA 4.416
 
 Transformation of loose solution ESA to COMB
 -----------------------------------------------
 For   10 Sites, RMS after 7 parameter transformation   4.6 mm  ESA wrt COMB 
   X-tran  +-      Y-tran  +-      Z-tran   +-   Scale   +-
   (mm)   (mm)     (mm)   (mm)      (mm)   (mm)  (ppb)  (ppb)
    2.9    2.3     22.5    2.4    -73.7    2.5  -1.954  0.740  ESA  CoM
 
 Adjustments to core site positions for ESA
 SITE    dNorth  +-     dEast   +-    dUp    +- 
          (mm)  (mm)    (mm)   (mm)   (mm)  (mm)
 SANT    12.5    3.3    6.4    6.7   24.7   11.8  ESA wrt COMB
 ALGO    -2.6    1.6    9.0    3.1   -8.9    4.5  ESA wrt COMB
 YELL     0.8    1.3   -5.6    2.3  -13.5    4.4  ESA wrt COMB
 GOLD    -8.6    1.5   -3.9    3.6  -11.2    6.4  ESA wrt COMB
 FAIR    -1.9    1.9  -10.5    2.8   14.5    6.2  ESA wrt COMB
 KOKB    -6.7    2.2   -2.7    4.4  -10.6    7.1  ESA wrt COMB
 TIDB     9.6    2.7    8.3    4.0   -2.2    8.9  ESA wrt COMB
 YAR1     7.3    1.9   -1.7    4.1   -2.2    6.9  ESA wrt COMB
 WTZR    -4.8    2.3   -4.1    2.9    6.5    4.9  ESA wrt COMB
 KOSG    -5.3    2.1   -2.5    2.7    2.7    4.8  ESA wrt COMB
 Core sites NOT used 
 MADR    -0.4    2.6    8.6    4.2    5.9    7.2  ESA wrt COMB
 Additional Sites 
 FORT     3.6    3.4   -9.4   10.6  -49.8    9.4  ESA wrt COMB
 AREQ     1.3    4.3    3.9   19.2   15.7   21.4  ESA wrt COMB
 MCM4    11.1    5.8   22.6    5.3   74.4    7.7  ESA wrt COMB
 GUAM     0.7    2.6  -16.4    8.3   24.8    7.5  ESA wrt COMB
 KIT3    -4.6    3.4   -9.3    4.9   10.8    5.1  ESA wrt COMB
 


[Mailed From: Tom Herring <tah at mtglas.mit.edu>]



More information about the IGSREPORT mailing list