[IGSREPORT-2753] Wk 0857 JPL Analysis Report
D
D
Mon Jun 24 15:11:17 PDT 1996
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Mon Jun 24 15:11:17 PDT 1996 Message Number 2753
******************************************************************************
Author: D C Jefferson
Subject: Wk 0857 JPL Analysis Report
******************************************************************************
JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0857 (DAYS 161-167, DATES 1996 Jun 09 - Jun 15)
******************************************************************************
Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team:
J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb
all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91109.
Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be
retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41),
directory pub/jpligsac/0857. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS.
______________________________________________________________________________
filename contents
______________________________________________________________________________
jpl08577.sum This text file.
jpl08577.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 857.
jpl08577.snx Ground station coordinates for GPS week 857, SINEX format.
jpl0857[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 857, sp3 format.
______________________________________________________________________________
Beginning this week, we summarize our first orbit statistics table using the
median repeatability value instead of the mean value:
Median Orbit Repeatability (see table below): 13.0 cm
According to the file nanu1996.mes obtained from the IGS CBIS, PRN26 was
unusable on day 162 for maintenance/repositioning. Data from this satellite
did not meet our convergence criteria on this nor the following day (163),
and have been excluded from these days' analyses accordingly.
Due to potential problems, data from stations mentioned below were not
considered for use in the global solution for the day indicated. (For
geographical reasons, they may not have been used in any case.)
WARNING: PIE1 (not ALGO) used as reference clock on day 162.
WARNING: NLIB (not ALGO) used as reference clock on days 163 and 164.
WARNING: ONSA (not ALGO) used as reference clock on days 165 and 166.
WARNING: Data from DGAR, MATE, ONSA, QUIN, STJO excluded day 161.
WARNING: Data from DGAR, GOPE, LAMA, MATE, NYAL, QUIN excluded day 162.
WARNING: Data from LAMA, MATE, QUIN, WEST excluded day 163.
WARNING: Data from ALGO, CASA, LAMA, QUIN, TRAK, ZWEN excluded day 164.
WARNING: Data from ALGO, ASC1, BOR1, CASA, GODE, LAMA, POL2 excluded day 165.
WARNING: Data from CASA, CMBB, LAMA, MONP, POL2, VILL excluded day 166.
WARNING: Data from CMBB, POL2 excluded day 167.
In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the integrated values based on estimated
LODR values in the adjacent column. See IGS Report No. 1498 (jpl07827.sum)
for details:
JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 857 (1996 Jun 09 - Jun 15)
MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt
10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d
50243.50 9919 58605 223459 1736 3 4 8 8 37 11 24 363 -155
50244.50 10258 58462 221695 1791 3 4 8 8 36 12 23 398 -159
50245.50 10659 58314 219884 1832 3 4 8 8 36 11 23 423 -196
50246.50 11088 58169 218050 1835 3 4 8 8 37 11 24 455 -197
50247.50 11527 57995 216230 1806 3 4 8 8 37 11 24 489 -202
50248.50 11961 57845 214455 1743 3 4 8 8 37 12 24 479 -173
50249.50 12388 57689 212750 1667 3 4 8 8 37 12 24 444 -171
END ERP TABLE
The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as
defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 857:
["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)]
JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 857 (1996 Jun 09 - Jun 15)
96 6 9 96 6 10 96 6 11 96 6 12 96 6 13 96 6 14 96 6 15
prn 3d rss (m)
1 0.29 0.23 0.11 0.14 0.20 0.20 0.20
2 0.16 0.16 0.07 0.13 0.09 0.12 0.15
3 0.37 0.23 0.32 0.32 0.33 0.24 0.28
4 0.09 0.13 0.12 0.10 0.10 0.17 0.14
5 0.14 0.21 0.13 0.08 0.14 0.11 0.07
6 0.09 0.14 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.07 0.10
7 0.14 0.17 0.20 0.14 0.15 0.18 0.11
9 0.18 0.15 0.10 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.14
14 0.10 0.15 0.05 0.10 0.10 0.12 0.10
15 0.29 0.20 0.14 0.08 0.07 0.12 0.12
16 0.09 0.10 0.11 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.12
17 0.08 0.12 0.08 0.08 0.09 0.14 0.12
18 0.18 0.20 0.19 0.19 0.18 0.22 0.23
19 0.16 0.15 0.32 0.32 0.25 0.16 0.18
21 0.08 0.06 0.08 0.08 0.10 0.17 0.14
22 0.13 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.13 0.12
23 0.17 0.21 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.16 0.20
24 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.08 0.11 0.17 0.12
25 0.13 0.17 0.15 0.10 0.11 0.11 0.13
26 0.2 0.1 0.08 0.09 0.16
27 0.10 0.11 0.10 0.09 0.15 0.11 0.08
28 0.25 0.20 0.19 0.13 0.10 0.10 0.16
29 0.20 0.13 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.09
31 0.20 0.17 0.21 0.22 0.17 0.13 0.11
_______________________
END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE
The following table statistically summarizes this week's "engineering data", as
described in IGS Report No. 1528:
JPL ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE GPS week 857 (1996 Jun 09 - Jun 15)
receiver/transmitter (dot means point positioned, * means fiducial site)
| days analyzed
| | rms clock noise (ns)
| | | average clock solution (us)
| | | | rms pseudorange (cm)
| | | | | (dot means pcode not analyzed)
| | | | | rms phase (mm)
| | | | | | average arc (hr)
| | | | | | |
|___ |__ |_______ |_______ |___ |___ |__
ALGO* 4.6 .927e-01 .630 48.6 4.95 2.99
AREQ 7.0 93.5 .351e-01 42.3 4.62 2.32
ASC1 4.8 .850e+04 -.544 62.3 5.51 1.69
BOGT 7.0 109. .492e-01 50.5 6.30 2.04
BRMU 2.0 116. .150 41.5 5.00 2.48
BRUS 2.0 .438 5.41 61.0 5.52 2.82
CAS1 4.9 18.6 .115e+04 35.4 5.22 2.16
CASA 1.0 18.8 76.5 43.0 4.00 2.40
CHAT 7.0 105. .460e-01 80.6 5.16 2.81
CRO1 1.0 157. -.111 48.0 6.00 2.34
DGAR 2.8 .173e+07 436. 67.0 4.65 .817
DRAO 1.0 .542 3.00 33.0 4.00 3.08
EISL 6.8 .762e+07 -.146e+05 40.6 6.44 2.81
FAIR* 7.0 .186 -.447e-01 43.6 4.87 2.58
FORT 5.9 171. -.202 49.2 5.34 3.08
GOL2* 6.9 .984e-01 .997 51.5 5.00 3.16
HART* 7.0 26.3 -1.83 44.7 4.31 2.83
HKLO 1.0 .289e+06 504. 44.0 6.00 2.74
IRKT 7.0 .499 .202 62.7 4.60 3.10
KERG 7.0 145. -9.38 . 5.16 2.61
KIRU 1.0 2.78 -.583 57.0 7.00 2.19
KIT3 4.9 142. -.363e-01 57.8 5.00 2.99
KOKB* 7.0 .920e+05 272. 73.6 5.30 2.96
KOSG* 5.8 1.94 4.76 43.2 4.03 2.47
KWJ1 6.0 81.3 .547e-01 48.7 7.24 1.91
LPGS 6.9 373. .356e-01 53.6 5.31 2.83
MAC1 3.9 75.6 -.138 32.0 3.53 2.21
MADR* 6.9 .134 .177 . 5.19 2.35
MALI 2.9 60.7 -18.4 . 8.00 2.51
MAS1 7.0 352. -3.34 46.9 4.00 2.88
MCM4 6.9 89.3 .444e-01 33.8 4.16 2.24
MDVO 1.0 .412 411. 70.0 6.00 2.58
NLIB 2.8 .619e-01 1.04 53.2 5.00 2.92
NOTO 3.0 .158 -21.4 37.4 4.70 3.18
OHIG 6.8 .185e+04 .161e-01 53.6 4.46 1.93
ONSA 1.9 . . 42.0 3.00 2.12
PAMA 7.0 156. .336e-01 . 10.2 2.16
PERT 6.8 .325e+04 19.1 51.9 5.45 3.05
PIE1 1.9 .994e-01 -1.31 39.0 4.55 3.17
POL2 1.8 100.0 .207 58.6 5.00 2.56
RCM5 6.0 93.6 .143 52.8 6.25 2.80
REYK 7.0 83.0 .378e-01 59.3 5.87 2.28
STJO 5.0 2.57 2.33 37.6 4.43 2.71
THU1 7.0 75.2 .412e-01 54.6 5.99 2.88
TID2* 7.0 .995e-01 -.839 44.2 5.00 3.14
TROM* 7.0 6.17 43.5 . 4.73 2.00
USUD 7.0 1.04 -.449 37.0 5.03 2.73
WTZR* 6.0 531. .936 61.6 5.97 2.69
YAR1* 7.0 91.6 -.567 . 4.76 2.48
YELL* 6.3 .586 -.327 56.3 5.08 2.23
PRN01 7.0 80.7 121. 49.2 5.45 2.55
PRN02 6.6 79.7 -264. 53.5 5.16 2.28
PRN03 7.0 80.0 21.3 49.7 5.00 2.55
PRN04 6.6 80.7 29.9 48.6 5.46 2.21
PRN05 6.7 80.9 43.7 52.7 5.30 2.23
PRN06 7.0 83.0 1.04 49.7 5.73 2.85
PRN07 7.0 81.6 722. 50.5 5.32 2.31
PRN09 7.0 80.8 -25.0 51.9 5.16 2.46
PRN14 7.0 82.5 14.2 49.1 5.16 2.25
PRN15 6.6 3.47 310. 55.7 5.00 2.49
PRN16 7.0 80.8 14.7 51.0 5.86 2.77
PRN17 6.7 82.1 -117. 53.7 5.45 2.50
PRN18 7.0 81.1 4.12 49.4 5.16 2.43
PRN19 7.0 80.2 474. 58.0 5.00 2.62
PRN21 7.0 80.0 -22.8 51.5 5.46 2.55
PRN22 6.8 82.7 314. 48.6 5.31 2.34
PRN23 7.0 81.1 .279 52.8 5.87 2.41
PRN24 6.6 81.2 -7.05 50.1 5.59 2.43
PRN25 7.0 81.6 -2.05 47.9 5.73 2.46
PRN26 5.0 80.5 -211. 51.6 5.00 2.63
PRN27 7.0 81.9 31.7 49.3 5.16 2.83
PRN28 7.0 2.09 88.0 59.2 4.87 2.53
PRN29 7.0 82.4 11.0 46.9 5.00 2.40
PRN31 7.0 81.7 542. 52.0 5.32 2.45
_______________________
END ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE
As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL
precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris:
JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
96 6 9 96 6 10 96 6 11 96 6 12 96 6 13 96 6 14 96 6 15
prn 3d rss (m)
1 4.5 5.1 4.1 3.0 4.0 3.7 5.0
2 5.9 6.9 7.9 7.9 5.5 6.5 7.0
3 5.3 4.2 3.9 3.4 4.4 4.2 4.1
4 7.4 7.6 6.6 6.9 7.6 7.4 8.4
5 6.1 7.0 7.6 8.8 7.5 9.5 11.1
6 3.3 3.3 3.9 4.3 4.9 5.8 4.0
7 4.3 4.1 4.1 3.9 4.6 4.6 4.1
9 3.9 3.7 3.9 3.9 3.9 4.2 4.3
14 11.2 6.9 4.5 4.4 4.7 4.5 5.1
15 4.9 5.5 5.5 4.8 4.3 4.2 4.5
16 12.8 3.8 3.8 5.0 4.5 4.2 4.5
17 4.5 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.6 4.6 2.7
18 3.7 4.6 4.1 2.7 3.3 3.4 3.3
19 11.5 2.4 3.2 3.1 3.6 3.5 4.5
21 6.8 6.7 6.1 5.5 6.5 7.3 6.6
22 6.2 5.7 6.4 7.0 6.9 7.3 7.7
23 5.8 5.4 4.0 4.7 3.9 5.2 4.1
24 6.6 6.4 6.2 5.6 5.6 5.4 5.6
25 4.9 4.8 4.5 4.6 4.3 4.1 4.1
26 1.9 4.1 1.7 3.1 2.9
27 6.0 5.8 4.6 4.8 4.7 4.9 4.9
28 2.5 2.7 3.5 3.5 4.4 4.4 3.9
29 2.2 2.7 1.9 1.9 2.2 1.7 2.1
31 3.7 3.0 2.9 3.3 3.3 2.8 3.2
_______________________
END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
global: algo areq asc1 bogt brmu brus cas1 casa chat cro1 dgar drao eisl fair fort gol2 hart hklo irkt kerg kiru kit3 kokb kosg kwj1 lpgs mac1 madr mali mas1 mcm4 mdvo nlib noto ohig onsa pama pert pie1 pol2 rcm5 reyk stjo thu1 tid2 trom usud wtzr yar1 yell
[Mailed From: djeff at cobra.jpl.nasa.gov]
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list