[IGSREPORT-2718] Wk 0855 JPL Analysis Report
D
D
Mon Jun 10 14:39:03 PDT 1996
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Mon Jun 10 14:39:03 PDT 1996 Message Number 2718
******************************************************************************
Author: D C Jefferson
Subject: Wk 0855 JPL Analysis Report
******************************************************************************
JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0855 (DAYS 147-153, DATES 1996 May 26 - Jun 01)
******************************************************************************
Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team:
J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb
all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91109.
Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be
retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41),
directory pub/jpligsac/0855. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS.
______________________________________________________________________________
filename contents
______________________________________________________________________________
jpl08557.sum This text file.
jpl08557.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 855.
jpl08557.snx Ground station coordinates for GPS week 855, SINEX format.
jpl0855[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 855, sp3 format.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mean Orbit Repeatability (see table below): 14.1 cm
According to the file nanu1996.mes obtained from the IGS CBIS, PRN04 was
unusable on day 150 for maintenance/repositioning. Data from this satellite
did not meet our convergence criteria on this nor the following day (151),
and have been excluded from these days' analyses accordingly. Also, note that
as data from PRN25 were not used in the analysis of day 146 (week 854, day 6),
there is only single-decimal precision for this satellite in our orbit
repeatability table on day 147.
Due to potential problems, data from stations mentioned below were not
considered for use in the global solution for the day indicated. (For
geographical reasons, they may not have been used in any case.)
WARNING: Data from DGAR, LAMA, POTS excluded day 147.
WARNING: Data from DGAR, KELY, MDVO, NYAL, POTS excluded day 148.
WARNING: Data from DGAR, KIRU, MATE, NOTO, POTS, SHAO, TAEJ, TIBB excluded day 149.
WARNING: Data from PRN20, ANKR, DGAR, KIRU, MATE, NYAL, POTS, TIBB excluded day 150.
WARNING: Data from PRN20, DGAR, KIRU, MATE, POTS excluded day 151.
WARNING: Data from GOPE, MATE, NYAL, RCM5 excluded day 152.
WARNING: Data from DGAR, MATE excluded day 153.
In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the integrated values based on estimated
LODR values in the adjacent column. See IGS Report No. 1498 (jpl07827.sum)
for details:
JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 855 (1996 May 26 - Jun 01)
MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt
10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d
50229.50 4178 59463 247379 1833 3 4 8 8 37 12 24 507 -35
50230.50 4684 59479 245552 1821 3 4 9 9 37 12 24 465 -28
50231.50 5151 59518 243760 1764 3 4 9 9 37 12 24 463 -30
50232.50 5537 59553 241993 1770 3 4 9 9 37 12 23 413 -27
50233.50 5904 59544 240251 1713 3 4 9 9 37 12 23 403 -30
50234.50 6287 59541 238539 1712 3 4 8 8 37 12 24 442 -68
50235.50 6717 59478 236852 1662 3 4 8 8 37 12 24 471 -68
END ERP TABLE
The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as
defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 855:
["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)]
JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 855 (1996 May 26 - Jun 01)
96 5 26 96 5 27 96 5 28 96 5 29 96 5 30 96 5 31 96 6 1
prn 3d rss (m)
1 0.11 0.19 0.25 0.29 0.21 0.18 0.19
2 0.10 0.14 0.25 0.13 0.12 0.26 0.21
3 0.39 0.38 0.30 0.40 0.35 0.32 0.24
4 0.08 0.10 0.1 0.1 0.10
5 0.09 0.10 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.14 0.13
6 0.15 0.10 0.08 0.12 0.13 0.27 0.09
7 0.07 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.11 0.24 0.19
9 0.07 0.12 0.14 0.25 0.18 0.14 0.16
14 0.15 0.07 0.15 0.11 0.10 0.13 0.06
15 0.14 0.10 0.14 0.10 0.15 0.17 0.18
16 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.06 0.07 0.09 0.07
17 0.15 0.12 0.11 0.10 0.10 0.16 0.12
18 0.08 0.08 0.13 0.18 0.14 0.11 0.13
19 0.16 0.24 0.23 0.34 0.07 0.12 0.10
21 0.22 0.12 0.11 0.13 0.12 0.13 0.08
22 0.13 0.09 0.11 0.11 0.10 0.08 0.14
23 0.13 0.11 0.14 0.13 0.09 0.10 0.17
24 0.10 0.07 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.13 0.10
25 0.1 0.13 0.16 0.11 0.11 0.17 0.11
26 0.09 0.07 0.07 0.15 0.10 0.13 0.09
27 0.10 0.10 0.21 0.05 0.09 0.08 0.09
28 0.23 0.27 0.25 0.20 0.12 0.16 0.14
29 0.08 0.12 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.10
31 0.13 0.19 0.13 0.18 0.14 0.22 0.24
_______________________
END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE
The following table statistically summarizes this week's "engineering data", as
described in IGS Report No. 1528:
JPL ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE GPS week 855 (1996 May 26 - Jun 01)
receiver/transmitter (dot means point positioned, * means fiducial site)
| days analyzed
| | rms clock noise (ns)
| | | average clock solution (us)
| | | | rms pseudorange (cm)
| | | | | (dot means pcode not analyzed)
| | | | | rms phase (mm)
| | | | | | average arc (hr)
| | | | | | |
|___ |__ |_______ |_______ |___ |___ |__
ALBH 1.0 10.2 3.01 43.0 4.00 2.95
ALGO* 6.6 . . 46.6 4.00 2.95
AREQ 7.0 98.0 -.337 37.9 5.00 2.39
ASC1 4.2 .800e+04 -1.31 66.5 5.59 1.55
BRMU 1.0 106. -.293 39.0 5.00 2.83
CAS1 6.9 20.0 808. 36.2 5.00 1.97
CHAT 6.9 104. -.325 78.9 5.14 3.08
CRO1 7.0 233. -.338 43.6 5.31 2.24
DGAR .5 .238e+06 -55.1 . 5.00 .670
EISL 6.7 .645e+07 -.124e+05 40.2 6.58 3.05
FAIR* 7.0 .167 -2.10 42.9 4.46 2.33
FORT 7.0 .129 -.688 51.7 8.37 3.35
GOL2* 7.0 .115 .866e-01 50.1 5.03 2.97
GUAM 1.0 119. -.219 . 8.00 2.02
HART* 7.0 185. .259 43.0 4.31 2.37
HKLO 6.0 .289e+06 499. 44.5 5.92 1.99
IISC 5.9 100. -.328 . 6.41 2.07
IRKT 6.9 .471 -.151 59.8 4.87 2.82
JPLM 7.0 112. 55.7 30.1 3.74 3.05
KERG 6.0 161. 1.66 . 5.67 2.44
KIRU 4.0 2.80 -.706 61.3 7.52 1.93
KIT3 4.0 139. -.322 52.8 4.77 2.58
KOKB* 6.9 271. .573 74.9 5.86 2.86
KOSG* 7.0 2.64 1.49 41.9 4.04 2.48
KWJ1 4.8 87.1 -.351 50.8 8.36 1.73
LPGS 3.6 .593e+04 -.364 56.0 5.00 2.87
MAC1 6.9 74.1 -.327 30.9 4.03 2.21
MADR* 7.0 .166 -.288 . 5.30 2.62
MAS1 5.8 .133e+04 -8.98 47.7 4.53 3.01
MCM4 7.0 84.2 -.332 33.0 4.15 1.91
MDVO 2.6 .244 892. 71.1 6.73 2.75
NOTO 5.8 .314 -19.4 37.2 4.42 3.03
OHIG 4.4 392. -.323 58.9 5.00 1.91
PAMA 6.9 .171e+04 -.406 . 9.86 2.20
PERT 6.7 1.73 35.8 50.2 4.47 2.75
POL2 2.9 88.8 -.322 52.7 5.00 2.63
RCM5 1.0 85.2 -.441 86.0 8.00 2.35
SHAO 3.8 .765e+06 .197e+04 42.7 4.56 2.22
STJO 7.0 2.80 .390 36.6 4.63 2.67
THU1 7.0 78.6 -.332 47.3 4.63 2.74
TID2* 7.0 .904e-01 -1.01 42.2 5.03 2.84
TROM* 7.0 8.72 78.3 . 5.03 1.91
USUD 5.0 1.25 -1.24 34.8 4.43 2.66
WTZR* 6.9 109. -.601 61.9 4.47 2.57
YAR1* 6.7 2.55 -.708 . 4.54 1.84
YELL* 7.0 .182 -.384 56.8 5.03 2.18
PRN01 7.0 79.3 105. 49.9 5.45 2.56
PRN02 7.0 78.9 -260. 51.0 5.45 2.40
PRN03 7.0 81.1 16.4 49.9 5.31 2.47
PRN04 4.7 80.7 27.4 49.1 5.42 2.15
PRN05 7.0 79.2 41.5 49.9 5.31 2.12
PRN06 7.0 81.9 .353 48.0 5.16 2.71
PRN07 7.0 80.2 721. 50.5 5.30 2.24
PRN09 7.0 82.8 -23.7 50.7 5.31 2.16
PRN14 7.0 82.2 13.6 48.1 5.00 2.23
PRN15 6.6 3.11 305. 52.0 5.45 2.42
PRN16 7.0 81.6 12.6 49.7 5.00 2.63
PRN17 6.8 81.6 -116. 48.6 6.03 2.39
PRN18 7.0 81.0 2.29 48.1 5.00 2.37
PRN19 7.0 80.3 474. 47.4 5.16 2.60
PRN21 7.0 81.9 -22.7 50.1 5.86 2.46
PRN22 7.0 80.9 310. 48.9 5.73 2.35
PRN23 7.0 82.1 10.7 49.1 5.74 2.18
PRN24 6.6 82.7 -73.4 49.2 5.59 2.30
PRN25 7.0 81.8 -2.30 48.3 5.30 2.47
PRN26 7.0 80.1 -203. 49.8 5.59 2.44
PRN27 7.0 78.1 29.8 48.0 5.00 2.68
PRN28 7.0 2.31 85.1 56.7 4.88 2.72
PRN29 6.9 82.2 10.1 45.3 5.31 2.34
PRN31 7.0 81.7 518. 50.2 5.30 2.35
_______________________
END ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE
As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL
precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris:
JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
96 5 26 96 5 27 96 5 28 96 5 29 96 5 30 96 5 31 96 6 1
prn 3d rss (m)
1 3.3 4.5 6.3 6.2 4.9 4.9 4.9
2 4.3 3.8 4.8 8.7 6.6 3.7 5.2
3 4.3 5.2 4.2 6.7 9.2 9.4 6.0
4 8.2 8.9 8.2 7.9 3.8
5 4.9 5.0 5.4 6.0 7.5 6.5 6.0
6 4.9 5.6 4.5 5.1 8.2 4.9 5.7
7 5.1 5.0 4.5 5.7 6.7 6.4 5.6
9 4.8 5.4 5.1 4.8 6.8 4.4 4.4
14 3.8 3.1 4.0 4.0 4.2 4.1 4.3
15 4.8 5.1 5.8 6.5 5.6 7.8 7.4
16 5.3 6.3 4.1 4.2 8.5 5.7 5.1
17 6.4 6.3 4.9 7.6 3.2 4.1 2.8
18 6.5 8.4 4.1 4.1 3.9 4.9 3.9
19 4.6 4.7 5.9 11.8 10.3 3.3 2.5
21 5.5 7.0 6.8 5.4 8.3 5.9 6.6
22 5.9 5.8 6.6 6.6 7.0 5.8 5.9
23 4.6 4.1 3.9 5.0 6.7 3.3 3.2
24 7.9 7.8 6.2 8.4 11.8 8.2 8.2
25 8.5 2.9 5.7 8.8 8.3 2.8 2.0
26 2.0 2.2 2.1 3.2 4.5 5.2 3.6
27 6.9 7.1 7.6 8.5 7.6 7.7 6.4
28 3.3 4.2 3.3 3.1 4.6 3.4 3.0
29 4.4 3.2 4.8 4.1 3.7 4.4 3.7
31 3.3 3.6 3.0 4.0 4.4 4.4 3.8
_______________________
END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
global: albh algo areq asc1 brmu cas1 chat cro1 dgar eisl fair fort gol2 guam hart hklo iisc irkt jplm kerg kiru kit3 kokb kosg kwj1 lpgs mac1 madr mas1 mcm4 mdvo noto ohig pama pert pol2 rcm5 shao stjo thu1 tid2 trom usud wtzr yar1 yell
[Mailed From: djeff at cobra.jpl.nasa.gov]
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list