[IGSREPORT-2813] Wk 0860 JPL Analysis Report
D
D
Tue Jul 16 16:02:43 PDT 1996
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Tue Jul 16 16:02:43 PDT 1996 Message Number 2813
******************************************************************************
Author: D C Jefferson
Subject: Wk 0860 JPL Analysis Report
******************************************************************************
JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0860 (DAYS 182-188, DATES 1996 Jun 30 - Jul 06)
******************************************************************************
Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team:
J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb
all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91109.
Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be
retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41),
directory pub/jpligsac/0860. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS.
______________________________________________________________________________
filename contents
______________________________________________________________________________
jpl08607.sum This text file.
jpl08607.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 860.
jpl08607.snx Ground station coordinates for GPS week 860, SINEX format.
jpl0860[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 860, sp3 format.
______________________________________________________________________________
Median Orbit Repeatability (see table below): 16.0 cm
Beginning this week, we constrain 12 of the IGS fiducial sites to their ITRF94
values, as given in IERS Technical Note 20. We used WTZR instead of WETT and
accounted for the fact that TID2 and TIDB are two receivers at the same site.
The remaining site, GOL2, was a special case because the ITRF94 coordinates for
GOLD do not properly account for the Landers and Northridge earthquakes. We
used the following position (m) and velocity (mm/yr) for GOL2 at epoch 1996.0:
GOL2 STA X -.235361415123117E+07 +- .529050478195959E-03
GOL2 STA Y -.464138539805232E+07 +- .663270315872765E-03
GOL2 STA Z .367697645430456E+07 +- .528434072057224E-03
GOL2 VEL X -.156547581841215E+02 +- .422752323085590E+00
GOL2 VEL Y .722421300517548E+01 +- .612404410416168E+00
GOL2 VEL Z -.888025056037026E+01 +- .482834187105716E+00
Due to potential problems, data from stations mentioned below were not
considered for use in the global solution for the day indicated. (For
geographical reasons, they may not have been used in any case.)
WARNING: Data from DAM2, EISL, LPGS, WSMN excluded day 182.
WARNING: Data from ASC1, COSO, DAM2, LPGS, MATE, NYAL excluded day 183.
WARNING: Data from COSO, LPGS, MATE excluded day 184.
WARNING: Data from COSO, DGAR, KELY, LPGS, MATE, NYAL, USC1 excluded day 185.
WARNING: Data from COSO, DGAR, GOLD, LPGS, MATE excluded day 186.
WARNING: Data from CHIL, COSO, DGAR, KELY, LBCH, LPGS, MATE excluded day 187.
WARNING: Data from DGAR, FAIR, GOLD, LMNO, LPGS, MATE excluded day 188.
In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the integrated values based on estimated
LODR values in the adjacent column. See IGS Report No. 1498 (jpl07827.sum)
for details:
JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 860 (1996 Jun 30 - Jul 06)
MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt
10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d
50264.50 17781 54902 190476 1241 3 4 8 8 37 12 24 411 -204
50265.50 18108 54663 189246 1219 3 4 8 8 37 11 24 382 -141
50266.50 18446 54346 188094 1085 3 4 8 8 37 11 24 336 -244
50267.50 18735 54078 186985 1134 3 4 8 8 37 12 25 353 -219
50268.50 19051 53792 185846 1144 3 4 8 8 37 12 25 403 -262
50269.50 19411 53493 184722 1104 3 4 8 8 37 12 25 400 -234
50270.50 19817 53255 183634 1072 3 4 8 8 37 11 25 409 -197
END ERP TABLE
The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as
defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 860:
["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)]
JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 860 (1996 Jun 30 - Jul 06)
96 6 30 96 7 1 96 7 2 96 7 3 96 7 4 96 7 5 96 7 6
prn 3d rss (m)
1 0.35 0.33 0.21 0.33 0.33 0.13 0.11
2 0.21 0.13 0.15 0.11 0.12 0.10 0.08
3 0.29 0.22 0.19 0.20 0.13 0.24 0.25
4 0.21 0.15 0.44 0.09 0.18 0.16 0.09
5 0.28 0.28 0.17 0.16 0.17 0.15 0.14
6 0.13 0.19 0.18 0.21 0.20 0.12 0.12
7 0.37 0.21 0.17 0.21 0.16 0.15 0.20
9 0.20 0.16 0.14 0.11 0.13 0.14 0.09
14 0.29 0.55 0.66 0.23 0.23 0.20 0.31
15 0.18 0.20 0.28 0.15 0.14 0.10 0.12
16 0.25 0.20 0.17 0.09 0.10 0.08 0.06
17 0.25 0.21 0.15 0.07 0.17 0.24 0.13
18 0.13 0.33 0.47 0.11 0.08 0.11 0.08
19 0.13 0.25 0.17 0.10 0.09 0.14 0.08
21 0.23 0.16 0.12 0.11 0.17 0.13 0.12
22 0.23 0.37 0.55 0.11 0.14 0.19 0.15
23 0.19 0.17 0.13 0.11 0.18 0.19 0.11
24 0.24 0.20 0.10 0.19 0.10 0.11 0.05
25 0.26 0.33 0.60 0.14 0.13 0.15 0.14
26 0.17 0.20 0.12 0.12 0.08 0.10 0.07
27 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.08 0.10 0.11 0.08
28 0.22 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.17 0.25 0.14
29 0.26 1.12 1.77 0.27 0.26 0.24 0.21
31 0.24 0.14 0.14 0.15 0.11 0.15 0.15
_______________________
END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE
The following table statistically summarizes this week's "engineering data", as
described in IGS Report No. 1528:
JPL ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE GPS week 860 (1996 Jun 30 - Jul 06)
receiver/transmitter (dot means point positioned, * means fiducial site)
| days analyzed
| | rms clock noise (ns)
| | | average clock solution (us)
| | | | rms pseudorange (cm)
| | | | | (dot means pcode not analyzed)
| | | | | rms phase (mm)
| | | | | | average arc (hr)
| | | | | | |
|___ |__ |_______ |_______ |___ |___ |__
ALGO* 6.7 . . 48.6 5.18 3.15
AREQ 7.0 89.9 -.961 38.6 5.15 2.44
ASC1 3.9 .398e+05 -3.33 72.3 6.42 1.63
BOGT 7.0 113. -.953 48.5 6.30 2.01
BRMU 4.0 102. -.967 43.0 8.09 2.51
CHAT 7.0 105. -.966 81.7 5.62 2.69
CRO1 5.0 161. -.952 43.2 5.04 2.05
DGAR 1.5 .396e+06 47.5 . 5.41 .823
EISL 5.9 .734e+07 -.155e+05 36.2 5.71 2.84
FAIR* 6.0 29.1 -.942 44.2 5.03 2.39
FORT 7.0 .128 -1.62 50.7 5.87 3.29
GOL2* 7.0 .125 -.781 48.9 5.18 3.06
GUAM 7.0 96.6 -.974 67.8 8.34 2.65
HART* 7.0 13.5 -10.9 44.2 4.46 2.72
HKLO 7.0 .289e+06 501. 45.0 6.47 2.65
IRKT 7.0 .520 -.923 63.3 5.45 3.10
JPLM 5.0 .253e+05 132. 35.8 5.02 2.62
KERG 7.0 154. -9.23 . 5.18 2.56
KIRU 5.0 236. -3.91 53.3 6.22 2.35
KIT3 7.0 217. -.986 60.3 5.18 3.11
KOKB* 7.0 .116 -51.0 76.1 5.45 2.94
KOSG* 7.0 612. 7.97 44.0 4.31 2.45
KWJ1 7.0 93.6 -.968 47.8 7.32 1.92
MADR* 6.6 .227 -.656 . 5.23 2.42
MALI 4.0 67.3 -8.13 . 8.26 2.60
MAS1 7.0 29.1 -5.01 45.6 4.49 2.83
MCM4 7.0 92.9 -.964 34.1 5.19 2.07
MDVO 1.9 .422 816. 68.5 6.53 2.59
NOTO 7.0 .174 -1.61 37.3 4.60 3.17
PAMA 7.0 .129e+04 -1.00 . 9.73 2.20
PERT 7.0 2.18 -.984 53.7 5.41 2.57
RCM5 7.0 101. -.967 52.6 8.60 2.61
REYK 5.9 90.9 -.950 58.7 6.37 1.92
STJO 7.0 3.15 3.07 38.3 6.18 2.76
THU1 7.0 77.6 -.969 49.3 5.76 2.69
TID2* 7.0 .997e-01 -.463 40.2 5.81 3.16
TROM* 4.8 4.34 190. . 4.61 2.02
USUD 7.0 53.3 -.814 34.0 6.05 3.02
WTZR* 7.0 159. -.310 64.0 5.21 2.77
YAR1* 7.0 42.6 -1.41 . 5.10 2.62
YELL* 7.0 .231 -1.27 50.9 5.15 1.95
PRN01 7.0 81.5 137. 50.9 6.00 2.59
PRN02 6.7 83.7 -271. 52.9 5.74 2.41
PRN03 7.0 82.4 27.1 50.6 5.87 2.68
PRN04 7.0 80.6 32.1 48.6 5.73 2.50
PRN05 6.6 81.1 45.5 51.1 6.15 2.05
PRN06 7.0 84.7 .488 50.7 6.45 2.64
PRN07 7.0 81.4 722. 52.3 5.86 2.36
PRN09 7.0 81.3 -2.86 50.4 5.73 2.37
PRN14 7.0 110. 12.7 50.9 6.30 2.62
PRN15 7.0 3.30 315. 58.2 6.15 2.53
PRN16 7.0 80.6 16.4 51.4 6.00 2.47
PRN17 7.0 78.7 -120. 50.3 6.17 2.73
PRN18 7.0 80.6 4.88 52.1 5.87 2.32
PRN19 7.0 80.6 466. 49.3 5.87 2.67
PRN21 7.0 82.3 -25.6 50.6 6.00 2.40
PRN22 6.8 83.7 319. 46.6 5.73 2.50
PRN23 7.0 80.6 .591e-01 51.6 6.15 2.52
PRN24 6.9 80.7 80.0 50.9 6.15 2.37
PRN25 7.0 82.9 -3.30 46.9 6.15 2.48
PRN26 7.0 79.8 -222. 49.7 5.73 2.84
PRN27 7.0 81.9 33.1 51.0 6.00 2.64
PRN28 7.0 2.08 90.8 60.2 5.00 2.64
PRN29 7.0 80.4 10.8 49.1 7.19 2.53
PRN31 7.0 81.9 577. 52.6 6.00 2.60
_______________________
END ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE
As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL
precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris:
JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
96 6 30 96 7 1 96 7 2 96 7 3 96 7 4 96 7 5 96 7 6
prn 3d rss (m)
1 4.4 4.4 4.1 4.5 3.9 4.7 5.1
2 2.8 3.1 5.4 5.0 3.5 4.1 4.1
3 3.2 3.6 3.9 5.3 4.8 3.8 4.6
4 5.8 6.4 6.1 7.3 5.7 5.1 4.9
5 9.3 7.6 6.3 6.6 7.5 7.0 6.5
6 6.1 5.3 8.4 6.4 6.2 5.7 5.8
7 4.3 4.8 4.6 4.1 5.0 4.5 4.0
9 3.3 3.2 3.3 4.3 3.1 3.3 3.6
14 5.9 6.1 5.6 6.0 26.5 18.4 13.0
15 4.3 3.6 3.5 4.0 4.1 3.6 4.5
16 6.0 5.9 6.0 6.3 8.7 8.5 8.6
17 4.5 4.4 4.9 4.2 4.7 4.4 4.4
18 2.7 3.1 2.7 2.7 3.1 3.9 4.3
19 3.4 4.0 2.1 1.8 1.5 2.7 4.7
21 3.6 3.0 3.7 4.1 4.0 5.0 6.8
22 6.3 7.7 8.7 5.3 5.4 5.3 7.5
23 13.3 10.5 10.0 8.5 6.7 4.9 3.2
24 4.6 4.6 4.9 4.9 6.0 5.4 4.7
25 5.0 4.1 4.1 5.1 5.3 5.5 4.3
26 2.4 2.6 2.3 1.5 2.1 1.7 2.2
27 5.8 6.4 5.6 3.8 4.2 6.9 6.2
28 2.9 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.4 3.6 6.5
29 3.9 3.0 24.2 39.1 20.5 5.4 3.7
31 2.9 3.4 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.9 2.9
_______________________
END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
global: algo areq asc1 bogt brmu chat cro1 dgar eisl fair fort gol2 guam hart hklo irkt jplm kerg kiru kit3 kokb kosg kwj1 madr mali mas1 mcm4 mdvo noto pama pert rcm5 reyk stjo thu1 tid2 trom usud wtzr yar1 yell
[Mailed From: djeff at cobra.jpl.nasa.gov]
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list