[IGSREPORT-2416] Wk 0839 JPL Analysis Report
D
D
Fri Feb 16 15:32:16 PST 1996
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Fri Feb 16 15:32:16 PST 1996 Message Number 2416
******************************************************************************
Author: D C Jefferson
Subject: Wk 0839 JPL Analysis Report
******************************************************************************
JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0839 (DAYS 35-41, DATES 1996 Feb 04 - Feb 10)
******************************************************************************
Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team:
J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb
all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91109.
Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be
retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41),
directory pub/jpligsac/0839. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS.
______________________________________________________________________________
filename contents
______________________________________________________________________________
jpl08397.sum This text file.
jpl08397.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 839.
jpl08397.snx Ground station coordinates for GPS week 839, SINEX format.
jpl0839[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 839, sp3 format.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mean Orbit Repeatability (see table below): 17.2 cm
According to the file nanu1996.mes obtained from the IGS CBIS, PRN16 was
unusable on day 037 for an indefinite period. Data from this satellite
did not meet our convergence criteria on this or the following day (038),
and were excluded from both the analyses of both days. Also, we continue
to exclude data from PRN12.
Due to potential problems, data from stations mentioned below were not
considered for use in the global solution for the day indicated. (For
geographical reasons, they may not have been used in any case.)
WARNING: PIE1 (not ALGO) used as reference clock for days 035, 038, and 039.
WARNING: Data from KRAK, MAC1, MOLA excluded day 035.
WARNING: Data from CHAT, CHIL, KRAK, PERT excluded day 036.
WARNING: Data from PRN16, CHAT, CHIL, HOLC, KRAK, LAMA, MATE, PERT, SIO3, USC1 excluded day 037.
WARNING: Data from PRN16, CHAT, CHIL, LAMA, LONG, MATE, PERT, SIO3, TROM, YAR1, ZWEN excluded day 038.
WARNING: Data from HERS, SNI1, USC1, WETT, ZWEN excluded day 039.
WARNING: Data from KELY, KRAK, LAMA, ZWEN excluded day 040.
WARNING: Data from CHIL, KELY, LAMA, TROM excluded day 041.
In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the integrated values based on estimated
LODR values in the adjacent column. See IGS Report No. 1498 (jpl07827.sum)
for details:
JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 839 (1996 Feb 04 - Feb 10)
MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt
10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d
50117.50 -22289 30405 494394 1937 4 5 11 11 37 11 24 -50 379
50118.50 -22325 30767 492462 1928 4 5 11 11 37 12 24 -34 354
50119.50 -22371 31135 490526 1944 5 7 12 12 37 8 23 -69 381
50120.50 -22438 31505 488545 2018 5 6 12 12 37 10 23 -30 359
50121.50 -22517 31859 486528 2015 4 5 11 11 37 11 24 -57 363
50122.50 -22597 32136 484512 2018 4 5 11 11 37 12 24 -12 311
50123.50 -22556 32390 482487 2031 4 5 12 12 37 11 24 31 317
END ERP TABLE
The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as
defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 839:
["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)]
JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 839 (1996 Feb 04 - Feb 10)
96 2 4 96 2 5 96 2 6 96 2 7 96 2 8 96 2 9 96 2 10
prn 3d rss (m)
1 0.17 0.16 0.12 0.09 0.11 0.10 0.16
2 0.11 0.16 0.14 0.09 0.08 0.10 0.11
4 0.15 0.35 0.23 0.10 0.20 0.14 0.11
5 0.13 0.09 0.18 0.18 0.22 0.12 0.11
6 0.11 0.17 0.40 0.26 0.10 0.16 0.13
7 0.11 0.13 0.29 0.29 0.20 0.14 0.11
9 0.23 0.16 0.07 0.08 0.10 0.12 0.11
14 0.16 0.10 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.21 0.09
15 0.26 0.25 0.16 0.20 0.28 0.27 0.23
16 0.23 0.2 0.2 0.16 0.12
17 0.11 0.11 0.12 0.13 0.10 0.13 0.10
18 0.08 0.12 0.14 0.12 0.17 0.22 0.09
19 0.13 0.10 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.18 0.12
20 0.07 0.07 0.12 0.13 0.14 0.09 0.07
21 0.19 0.18 0.10 0.13 0.23 0.20 0.13
22 0.11 0.16 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.22 0.18
23 0.29 0.42 0.39 0.29 0.42 0.51 0.56
24 0.25 0.28 0.14 0.19 0.33 0.19 0.11
25 0.23 0.21 0.17 0.23 0.29 0.22 0.21
26 0.21 0.17 0.10 0.19 0.18 0.14 0.11
27 0.10 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.12 0.20 0.13
28 0.11 0.24 0.12 0.25 0.15 0.20 0.11
29 0.15 0.12 0.20 0.21 0.18 0.15 0.14
31 0.14 0.25 0.16 0.14 0.19 0.24 0.27
_______________________
END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE
The following table statistically summarizes this week's "engineering data", as
described in IGS Report No. 1528:
JPL ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE GPS week 839 (1996 Feb 04 - Feb 10)
receiver/transmitter (dot means point positioned, * means fiducial site)
| days analyzed
| | rms clock noise (ns)
| | | average clock solution (us)
| | | | rms pseudorange (cm)
| | | | | (dot means pcode not analyzed)
| | | | | rms phase (mm)
| | | | | | average arc (hr)
| | | | | | |
|___ |__ |_______ |_______ |___ |___ |__
ALBH 6.9 .903e+04 28.5 40.0 3.78 2.51
ALGO* 6.6 .145 1.31 39.3 4.32 2.84
AREQ 5.9 86.3 .283e-01 41.2 5.00 2.52
AUCK 3.0 83.7 -.160 39.7 6.04 2.93
BRMU 6.9 119. .128 37.0 5.31 2.89
BRUS 4.9 .357 5.07 58.4 4.22 2.69
CAT1 1.0 183. -.644 35.0 5.00 2.86
CHAT 3.8 119. .332 82.6 5.52 2.55
CICE 1.0 86.9 -.591 32.0 4.00 2.75
CRO1 6.9 130. .131 42.7 6.65 2.08
EISL 5.7 .706e+07 -.133e+05 39.4 7.52 2.55
FAI2 6.9 .155 .177e-01 48.9 4.35 2.44
FAIR* 6.9 .145 -8.94 . 4.00 2.22
FORT 6.9 .163 -.779 50.8 6.87 2.61
GOL2 6.9 .635e+04 16.5 49.4 4.00 2.86
GOLD* 5.5 385. 2.36 . 2.71 2.19
GRAS 1.0 76.9 .674 32.0 4.00 2.89
GUAM 6.8 104. .125 47.1 9.51 2.53
HART* 5.6 31.9 2.20 . 6.68 1.96
IISC 5.7 74.5 .256 65.4 4.86 2.22
IRKT 3.9 .530 -.164 47.2 5.00 2.96
JPLM 1.0 108. .115e+04 28.0 4.00 3.59
KERG 6.8 178. -642. . 5.16 2.23
KIRU 6.9 5.00 12.1 50.6 8.02 1.91
KIT3 5.6 115. .240 59.5 4.69 3.05
KOKB* 6.9 35.3 .111 45.7 6.07 2.80
LPGS 5.7 .474e+04 1.33 178. 5.19 1.82
MADR* 5.4 .710 -.950 . 4.51 2.17
MALI 1.0 .271e+07 .456e+04 . 7.00 2.13
MDO1 1.0 1.64 -1.59 33.0 4.00 2.96
NOTO 2.9 .103e+05 46.9 34.0 4.71 2.98
OHIG 4.9 .310e+05 -3.80 59.3 4.34 .993
ONSA .9 .292 -1.89 38.0 4.00 2.25
PAMA 5.9 930. -.493e-01 . 10.9 2.29
PERT 3.9 1.85 -4.38 49.0 4.27 3.23
PIE1 3.7 . . 38.0 4.25 2.60
SANT* 6.9 1.12 .791 . 5.00 2.09
SHAO 5.8 99.1 .174e-01 42.5 3.84 2.57
STJO 6.9 164. .887 40.0 4.20 2.82
THU1 6.9 70.2 .133 46.3 4.59 2.68
TID2 6.9 .159 .160 40.4 4.75 3.16
TIDB* 5.5 .175 2.07 . 4.84 2.81
TMGO 1.0 84.5 -.570 39.0 4.00 2.56
TROM* 4.9 3.18 140. . 4.22 1.84
TSKB 2.0 1.06 -.121e+04 46.5 4.00 3.09
USUD 4.9 2.54 1.37 35.8 4.00 2.88
VILL 4.9 2.57 4.15 63.1 4.43 2.73
WETT* 5.9 .149 2.68 . 5.78 2.26
YAR1* 4.6 74.0 3.71 . 4.16 2.57
YELL* 6.9 419. .490 42.9 4.02 2.16
ZWEN 3.9 .582e+05 2.37 55.9 4.00 2.50
PRN01 6.9 83.0 519. 46.3 5.00 2.55
PRN02 6.9 79.1 -230. 46.8 5.30 2.78
PRN04 6.9 81.6 10.2 45.3 5.59 2.17
PRN05 6.9 83.1 23.6 45.5 5.44 2.45
PRN06 6.9 81.5 6.15 47.3 5.29 2.45
PRN07 6.9 79.2 716. 48.3 5.59 2.25
PRN09 6.9 81.1 -10.5 47.9 5.16 2.10
PRN14 6.6 82.3 12.7 48.0 5.45 2.35
PRN15 6.9 2.96 269. 50.5 5.15 2.51
PRN16 4.6 80.9 -176. 56.9 6.02 2.04
PRN17 6.9 81.5 -106. 48.1 5.16 2.32
PRN18 6.9 80.9 -6.30 49.3 5.44 2.45
PRN19 6.9 82.7 358. 45.9 5.00 2.56
PRN20 6.9 83.6 3.84 46.5 5.00 2.28
PRN21 6.7 80.8 -13.1 48.8 5.31 2.59
PRN22 6.5 80.6 284. 48.2 5.15 2.39
PRN23 6.6 82.0 6.82 45.5 5.44 2.25
PRN24 6.9 79.8 139. 49.2 5.87 2.05
PRN25 6.9 80.3 -.614 46.3 5.30 2.30
PRN26 6.9 80.8 -147. 48.2 5.59 2.60
PRN27 6.9 80.3 18.3 43.7 5.00 2.52
PRN28 6.9 2.27 64.4 55.3 5.00 2.72
PRN29 6.9 82.9 6.40 45.5 5.00 2.45
PRN31 6.9 81.1 292. 47.4 5.15 2.75
_______________________
END ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE
As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL
precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris:
JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
96 2 4 96 2 5 96 2 6 96 2 7 96 2 8 96 2 9 96 2 10
prn 3d rss (m)
1 5.0 3.3 4.3 4.0 4.9 3.5 3.9
2 7.8 8.6 7.7 5.9 6.2 6.1 5.7
4 2.9 2.4 2.5 2.3 2.0 3.4 3.2
5 7.2 7.0 6.2 4.9 6.0 5.3 7.4
6 4.7 5.2 5.3 5.4 6.5 5.1 5.7
7 4.9 4.0 4.5 4.9 3.4 4.0 3.9
9 4.5 3.2 4.6 4.1 3.0 2.9 2.9
14 8.8 6.8 8.4 6.6 5.4 6.6 5.2
15 3.5 4.0 3.4 3.6 5.2 4.5 4.9
16 9.2 6.1 16.4 6.9 4.2
17 4.4 4.4 4.2 3.9 4.2 4.1 3.8
18 3.5 3.6 3.2 4.0 5.7 3.9 5.2
19 4.6 4.9 4.7 3.4 3.0 3.2 3.2
20 3.6 4.3 4.4 6.7 2.7 3.3 5.9
21 9.2 10.9 9.8 8.8 9.4 7.3 6.1
22 7.3 11.3 4.4 3.6 4.8 4.3 4.6
23 19.4 14.5 20.6 16.8 22.9 24.4 19.0
24 3.6 3.4 3.5 4.0 5.5 4.7 3.2
25 5.1 3.5 3.6 4.5 2.8 3.2 3.3
26 2.9 2.7 2.8 3.8 3.3 4.1 3.1
27 4.4 5.0 3.2 4.4 3.3 4.1 3.9
28 4.0 3.9 4.6 4.3 4.0 4.0 3.6
29 3.2 3.0 3.4 3.9 3.8 4.1 3.7
31 2.8 2.4 2.5 2.4 2.5 2.9 3.0
_______________________
END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
[Mailed From: djeff at cobra.jpl.nasa.gov]
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list