[IGSREPORT-2228] Wk 0829 JPL Analysis Report
D
D
Tue Dec 12 09:10:08 PST 1995
******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report Tue Dec 12 9:10:08 PST 1995 Message Number 2228
******************************************************************************
Author: D C Jefferson
Subject: Wk 0829 JPL Analysis Report
******************************************************************************
JPL ANALYSIS REPORT GPS-WEEK 0829 (DAYS 330-336, DATES 1995 Nov 26 - Dec 02)
******************************************************************************
Submitted by the JPL IGS/FLINN Analysis Team:
J F Zumberge, D C Jefferson, M B Heflin, M M Watkins, F H Webb
all at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology,
Pasadena, CA 91109.
Files listed below are available in Unix compressed format and can be
retrieved using anonymous ftp to sideshow.jpl.nasa.gov (128.149.70.41),
directory pub/jpligsac/0829. These files have also been sent to the CDDIS.
______________________________________________________________________________
filename contents
______________________________________________________________________________
jpl08297.sum This text file.
jpl08297.erp Earth rotation parameters for GPS week 829.
jpl08297.snx Ground station coordinates for GPS week 829, SINEX format.
jpl0829[0-6].sp3 GPS ephemerides for GPS week 829, sp3 format.
______________________________________________________________________________
Mean Orbit Repeatability (see table below): 18.9 cm
Beginning this week, we include data from several new stations. As with most
stations, these sites are given the opportunity to participate in the orbit
and clock solution as the global site distribution varies. The following
nominal coordinates were assumed:
X (m) Y (m) Z (m)
POL2 (Bishkek, Kyrghystan): 1239957.8574 4530783.6844 4302571.2275
SNI1 (San Nicolas Isl. CA, USA): -2631325.5275 -4646244.9408 3477048.3548
SOL1 (Solomon's Island MD, USA): 1173592.5150 -4871195.0157 3933256.6507
STRL (Sterling, Wash. D.C., USA): 1076000.7801 -4846966.3938 3990388.6871
WLPS (Wallops Island VA, USA): 1263662.9174 -4875638.1543 3899917.7935
Due to potential problems, data from stations mentioned below were not
considered for use in the global solution for the day indicated. (For
geographical reasons, they may not have been used in any case.)
WARNING: Data from ANKR, GOPE, KELY, KOSG, MAS1, NOTO, ONSA, TABL excluded day 330.
WARNING: Data from GOPE, HART, HERS, KELY, KOSG, LONG, MAS1, NOTO, ONSA, TABL, VNDP excluded day 331.
WARNING: Data from KOSG, MAS1, MDVO, ONSA, SANT, TABL excluded day 332.
WARNING: Data from KOSG, MATE, SANT, SEY1, TABL, WETT, WHI1 excluded day 333.
WARNING: Data from CHIL, MATE, WETT, WHI1 excluded day 334.
WARNING: Data from CHIL, JOZE, KELY, MATE, MONP excluded day 335.
WARNING: Data from KELY, MAS1, SEY1 excluded day 336.
In the following table, UT1R-UTC are the integrated values based on estimated
LODR values in the adjacent column. See IGS Report No. 1498 (jpl07827.sum)
for details:
JPL ERP TABLE GPS week 829 (1995 Nov 26 - Dec 02)
MJD XPole Ypole UT1R-UTC LODR Xsig Ysig UTsig LODsig Nr Nf Nt Xrt Yrt
10**-5" usec us/d 10**-5" us us/d 10**-5"/d
50047.50 -7086 10152 -354541 2616 5 5 11 11 37 11 24 -335 150
50048.50 -7458 10314 -357125 2553 5 5 11 11 37 10 24 -344 154
50049.50 -7831 10491 -359716 2629 4 5 11 11 37 10 24 -365 159
50050.50 -8283 10652 -362333 2605 5 6 11 11 37 9 24 -430 179
50051.50 -8781 10850 -364906 2541 4 5 11 11 37 11 24 -445 134
50052.50 -9327 11019 -367437 2520 4 5 11 11 37 12 24 -396 168
50053.50 -9823 11167 -369935 2477 4 5 11 11 37 12 24 -372 130
END ERP TABLE
The following table indicates the "3-dimensional orbit repeatability", as
defined in IGS Mail Message 37, for GPS week 829:
["3d rss" = sqrt(xrms**2 + yrms**2 + zrms**2)]
JPL ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE GPS week 829 (1995 Nov 26 - Dec 02)
95 11 26 95 11 27 95 11 28 95 11 29 95 11 30 95 12 1 95 12 2
prn 3d rss (m)
1 0.27 0.15 0.29 0.29 0.11 0.15 0.15
2 0.13 0.10 0.16 0.12 0.16 0.23 0.20
4 0.19 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.22 0.16 0.20
5 0.19 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.12 0.12 0.12
6 0.19 0.15 0.16 0.16 0.17 0.12 0.16
7 0.18 0.22 0.14 0.15 0.17 0.18 0.11
9 0.37 0.31 0.26 0.33 0.15 0.17 0.13
14 0.17 0.14 0.14 0.12 0.16 0.15 0.19
15 0.29 0.27 0.16 0.20 0.26 0.24 0.23
16 0.14 0.15 0.13 0.17 0.23 0.12 0.18
17 0.41 0.23 0.23 0.18 0.12 0.14 0.14
18 0.09 0.12 0.14 0.22 0.20 0.14 0.25
19 0.13 0.19 0.20 0.14 0.21 0.23 0.11
20 0.27 0.18 0.15 0.11 0.16 0.16 0.11
21 0.23 0.21 0.25 0.16 0.28 0.26 0.20
22 0.14 0.12 0.14 0.14 0.20 0.11 0.14
23 0.47 0.46 0.60 0.52 0.56 0.67 0.50
24 0.18 0.19 0.23 0.21 0.23 0.13 0.16
25 0.20 0.18 0.07 0.09 0.13 0.14 0.09
26 0.17 0.17 0.14 0.12 0.15 0.10 0.16
27 0.18 0.18 0.31 0.28 0.15 0.10 0.18
28 0.19 0.19 0.14 0.15 0.12 0.13 0.12
29 0.18 0.14 0.13 0.13 0.17 0.17 0.23
31 0.23 0.16 0.23 0.17 0.11 0.15 0.09
_______________________
END ORBIT REPEATABILITY TABLE
The following table statistically summarizes this week's "engineering data", as
described in IGS Report No. 1528:
JPL ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE GPS week 829 (1995 Nov 26 - Dec 02)
receiver/transmitter (dot means point positioned, * means fiducial site)
| days analyzed
| | rms clock noise (ns)
| | | average clock solution (us)
| | | | rms pseudorange (cm)
| | | | | (dot means pcode not analyzed)
| | | | | rms phase (mm)
| | | | | | average arc (hr)
| | | | | | |
|___ |__ |_______ |_______ |___ |___ |__
ALBH 2.0 25.1 4.04 37.1 5.10 2.57
ALGO* 6.8 . . 41.1 3.87 2.99
AREQ 6.5 81.7 -.277 46.8 5.39 2.38
AUCK 7.0 76.6 -.272 41.3 4.63 2.88
BOR1 2.0 1.98 -2.18 33.5 3.00 3.01
BRMU 4.0 160. -.269 42.8 5.62 2.88
BRUS 2.0 557. 1.30 62.5 4.00 2.61
CAS1 7.0 14.1 472. 59.3 5.00 1.51
CICE 7.0 85.5 -.277 31.3 4.00 2.78
CRO1 6.9 227. -.273 43.5 7.38 2.22
FAIR* 7.0 .831 -1.01 . 4.45 1.89
FORT 1.0 .685e-01 -1.10 50.0 6.00 2.84
GOLD* 6.9 1.06 -1.03 . 3.15 2.32
GUAM 7.0 99.2 -.280 50.4 7.70 2.60
HART* 6.0 43.8 11.0 . 8.18 1.89
HKLO 1.0 .291e+06 526. 44.0 4.00 .844
HOB2 7.0 .342 -.176e-01 47.9 5.45 2.97
IISC 6.7 667. -.297 67.9 5.49 2.29
IRKT 6.8 175. -.279 52.2 4.16 2.78
KELY .6 .338e+04 -.694 48.0 6.00 1.30
KERG 7.0 147. -307. . 5.45 2.62
KIRU 7.0 2.68 11.4 55.7 8.01 1.86
KIT3 4.7 .296e+04 -.343 87.3 4.45 2.84
KOK2 7.0 32.4 -.160 45.6 6.14 2.52
KOKB* 7.0 .524 -2.06 . 6.00 2.32
KOSG* 3.0 2.46 2.74 . 3.37 2.11
KOUR 7.0 3.58 41.8 . 8.64 1.93
LPGS 2.4 .387e+07 .457e+04 61.2 5.64 2.50
MAC1 2.0 .152e+06 -.606e+04 31.5 4.52 1.93
MADR* 7.0 .249 -.897 . 4.74 2.31
MAS1 1.8 801. -3.39 159. 5.51 1.10
MCM4 6.5 92.4 -.271 46.0 5.16 1.63
MDO1 1.0 1.92 -.943 30.0 5.00 2.94
NOTO 5.0 .187 -15.5 26.8 3.43 2.89
OHIG 4.6 .280e+05 .131 53.0 5.23 1.54
PAMA 7.0 8.04 -.285 . 13.1 .778
PERT 7.0 .207e+04 12.5 52.3 4.74 3.16
RCM5 5.7 .749 .221 48.6 5.38 2.86
SANT* 5.0 .878 -.223 . 5.00 2.37
SEY1 4.8 .799e+07 -.128e+05 . 9.11 1.57
SHAO 7.0 85.6 -.268 94.7 4.16 2.32
STJO 7.0 3.15 2.59 42.8 4.49 2.91
THU1 .9 69.8 -.267 49.0 5.00 2.70
TIDB* 7.0 .145 .891e-01 . 6.05 2.75
TSKB 6.0 7.96 -60.5 58.7 3.85 3.20
VILL 2.0 2.16 -3.42 67.5 4.00 3.08
WETT* 5.0 .131 .751e-01 . 6.04 2.32
YAR1* 7.0 1.81 -.327 . 4.46 2.68
YELL* 7.0 .201 -.286 43.4 4.59 1.87
ZWEN 2.0 .391e+05 -1.06 64.0 4.53 2.49
PRN01 6.9 81.3 591. 54.4 5.87 2.03
PRN02 7.0 83.2 -212. 47.7 5.45 2.43
PRN04 6.8 82.6 55.0 50.3 6.00 1.98
PRN05 7.0 83.6 11.8 51.0 5.30 2.26
PRN06 7.0 81.3 3.01 53.4 5.59 2.26
PRN07 7.0 81.3 712. 51.3 6.00 2.17
PRN09 6.9 78.7 -2.99 53.4 5.59 2.13
PRN14 7.0 80.1 11.6 53.9 5.60 2.18
PRN15 6.6 3.84 247. 56.7 5.90 1.91
PRN16 7.0 81.9 -147. 49.2 6.00 2.45
PRN17 6.6 80.1 -99.7 52.2 5.73 2.15
PRN18 7.0 80.1 -4.86 46.5 5.73 2.44
PRN19 7.0 83.3 171. 50.1 5.86 2.24
PRN20 7.0 80.8 61.7 54.2 6.00 2.25
PRN21 6.9 80.3 -8.86 57.0 5.60 2.37
PRN22 7.0 83.2 266. 49.8 6.00 2.41
PRN23 7.0 80.8 3.84 51.8 5.31 2.15
PRN24 6.8 79.7 274. 53.8 6.30 1.97
PRN25 7.0 82.4 .496e-01 52.5 6.15 2.07
PRN26 7.0 82.1 -118. 49.7 5.60 2.24
PRN27 7.0 82.0 10.5 49.7 5.86 2.35
PRN28 7.0 2.28 50.3 98.9 4.87 2.66
PRN29 7.0 81.0 3.28 48.3 5.46 2.44
PRN31 7.0 80.6 81.5 50.8 5.86 2.21
_______________________
END ENGINEERING DATA SUMMARY TABLE
As described in IGS Mail Message 37, the following table compares the JPL
precise ephemerides with those from the broadcast ephemeris:
JPL COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
95 11 26 95 11 27 95 11 28 95 11 29 95 11 30 95 12 1 95 12 2
prn 3d rss (m)
1 6.6 6.2 3.0 6.5 3.3 4.8 7.1
2 7.8 8.2 6.1 5.7 5.7 5.7 7.9
4 5.0 5.1 6.0 5.3 6.8 8.1 8.7
5 7.2 7.3 7.2 8.4 8.1 6.7 5.0
6 5.1 4.4 4.4 4.7 4.6 4.2 4.1
7 5.9 5.6 4.5 3.6 4.0 4.2 4.5
9 6.4 8.9 8.1 6.8 7.7 7.3 9.5
14 2.6 4.1 7.4 3.3 2.9 3.1 4.3
15 4.9 6.1 6.8 6.9 8.1 9.0 5.8
16 4.0 5.1 7.3 5.1 5.8 4.2 7.2
17 4.8 3.2 3.7 4.0 5.7 6.7 6.8
18 4.3 6.8 6.5 6.1 5.8 8.0 4.0
19 4.4 9.1 6.8 9.7 8.2 8.9 9.6
20 6.1 6.4 5.8 7.9 10.3 5.1 4.6
21 5.1 4.8 3.3 4.5 5.9 9.6 9.4
22 7.4 4.5 8.3 6.7 8.0 3.5 9.2
23 4.5 3.6 4.7 4.6 4.0 6.0 5.4
24 5.3 5.5 6.3 6.9 7.4 7.6 7.9
25 8.5 8.6 6.1 6.3 6.7 7.8 8.1
26 12.9 13.0 13.7 13.6 11.2 13.0 14.8
27 8.6 8.7 7.9 8.7 7.2 7.6 9.0
28 3.3 2.9 3.1 3.0 4.3 5.7 8.5
29 3.8 3.9 3.6 5.6 4.3 4.0 4.2
31 2.5 2.5 3.4 2.6 2.5 3.4 7.0
_______________________
END COMPARISON OF BROADCAST NAVIGATION MESSAGE WITH PRECISE EPHEMERIDES
[Mailed From: djeff at cobra.jpl.nasa.gov]
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list