[IGSREPORT-263] EMR Analysis Report (week 694)
J.
J.
Tue May 11 17:40:50 PDT 1993
***********************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report 11-MAY-1993 17:40:50 Message Number 263
***********************************************************************
From: J. Kouba
Subj: EMR Analysis Report (week 694)
-------------------------------------
(Apr. 25- May 01,93)
Submitted by:
J. Kouba **, P. Tetreault, R. Ferland, F. Lahaye, P. Heroux, L. Mancuso
Geodetic Survey Division (GSD), Surveys Mapping & Remote Sensing Sector
(SMRS), Energy Mines and Resources (EMR), 615 Booth Str., Ottawa, K1A 0E9
** on secondment to the Geodetic Survey from the Geophysics Div.
Geological Survey of Canada (GSC), EMR, 1 Observatory Crescent,
Ottawa, K1A 0Y3
Our analysis utilizes the JPL GIPSY/OASIS II (UNIX) software system
and data from all (up to 7) Canadian stations augmented by up to 12, globally
distributed, core stations (see Table 1 for the list of stations).
This effort is a part of a joint pilot project to test the so called
"Active Control System" in Canada and involves the Geodetic Survey Division
(GSD), SMRSS, the Geophysics Division and Pacific Geoscience Centre of the
Geological Survey of Canada, all three institutions are part of the
Department of Energy, Mines & Resources (EMR).
Table 1 : Station Summary (also indicated are day no. for which a
particular station is not included in the daily solution, either due to
being down or data being late).
STATION IGS code MISSING DAY NO. 1993
Albert Head, CAN ALBH
Algonquin, CAN ALGO*
Fairbanks FAIR* 117
Goldstone GOLD*
Hartebeesthoek HART*
Holberg,CAN HOLB
Kokee Park KOKB 120
Madrid MADR*
McMurdo MCMU* 118, 120
Pamatai PAMA
Penticton, CAN DRAO
Santiago SANT* 121
St. Johns, CAN STJO
Canbera TIDB* 118, 120
Tromsoe TROM*
Wettzell WETT*
Yarragadee YAR1* 117
Yellowknife, CAN YELL*
* indicates constrained stations, remaining are solved for (50m apriori sig.)
SOLUTION CHARACTERISTICS
Reference frame and orientation:
Nominally ITRF91, at epoch 1992.5 is realized by constraining up to 12
of the above stations at the IGS coordinates (see IGS message #90).
Orientation is realized through the above coordinates and, once a week,
the fixed DUT1 values from the current NEOS/IERS (Bull. A).
Constants and models:
- no change, see the IGS mess. #101 for details.
Estimation strategies:
- no change, see the IGS mess. #101 for details - , except for the estimation
of DUT1, stochastic orbit modeling, new weighting of L3,P3,
see IGS mess. #130.
ALGO was used as time reference.
Aposteriori variance factors typically are between 0.5 and 1.0 (noise
about 3mm and 200mm for phase and smoothed pseudorange observations, resp.).
PRODUCTS GENERATED:
The following products are generated and uploaded into CDDIS @ NASA/GSFC
EMR06940-6.EPH GPS ephem. files for days 0-6, week # 694 in sp3 format
EMR06947.ERP pole x,y and DUT1 solutions for week # 694
EMR06947.SUM name of this text summary file
REMARKS on EMR's products:
1. ALGO hydrogen maser used as a time reference. In the sp3 EPH file sat.
epochs with no reference (e.g. ALGO not observing a satellite) have a value
of 99999. microseconds.
ALGO clock error & drift were about -170 ns (49102) & -60 ns/day w.r.t.
GPS time.
2. AS was on from April 25 through to May 01. No DUT1 estimation on AS days.
3. Orbits and EOP solutions affected by AS. Errors up to 12 m.
4. Pseudorange data for AS satellites weighted with 100m (1 sigma).
More information about the IGSREPORT
mailing list