[IGSREPORT-357] EMR Analysis Report (week 702)

[Jan]

***********************************************************************
IGS Electronic Report      1-JUL-1993 08:50:31       Message Number 357
***********************************************************************
 

From: Jan Kouba 
Subj: EMR Analysis Report (week 702)
-------------------------------------
					          (Jun 20 - Jun 26,93)

      Our analysis utilizes the JPL GIPSY/OASIS II (UNIX) software system 
and data from all (up to 7) Canadian stations augmented by up to 12, globally 
distributed, core stations (see Table 1 for the list of stations).  

      This effort is a part of a joint pilot project  called 
"Active Control System" and involves the Geodetic Survey Division  (GSD),
SMRSS; the Geophysics Division and Pacific Geoscience Centre of the
Geological Survey of Canada, all three institutions are part of the  
Department of Energy, Mines & Resources (EMR).

      Table 1 : Station Summary (also indicated are day no. for which a 
particular station is not included in the daily solution, either due to
being down or data being late). 
                               
   STATION            IGS code       MISSING DAY NO. 1993
Albert Head, CAN       ALBH            
Algonquin, CAN         ALGO*        
Fairbanks              FAIR*                              
Goldstone              GOLD*            
Hartebeesthoek         HART*            177
Holberg,CAN            HOLB             175, 176
Kokee Park             KOKB              
Madrid                 MADR*           
McMurdo                MCMU*             
Pamatai                PAMA             171 to 177 
Penticton, CAN         DRAO             
Santiago               SANT*              
St. Johns, CAN         STJO             
Canbera                TIDB*             
Tromsoe                TROM*            
Wettzell               WETT*            
Yarragadee             YAR1*                 
Yellowknife, CAN       YELL*            
* indicates constrained stations, remaining are solved for (50m apriori sig.)

SOLUTION CHARACTERISTICS

Reference frame and orientation:
      Nominally ITRF91, at epoch 1992.5 is realized by constraining up to 12 
of the above stations at the IGS coordinates (see IGS message #90). 
Orientation is realized through the above coordinates and, once a week, 
the fixed DUT1 values from the current NEOS/IERS (Bull. A).

Constants and models: 
- no change, see the IGS mess. #101 for details.

Estimation strategies:
- no change, see the IGS mess. #101 for details - , except for the estimation
  of DUT1, stochastic orbit modeling, new weighting of L3,P3,
  see IGS mess. #130.

      ALGO was used as time reference.                           
      Aposteriori variance factors typically are between 0.5 and 1.0 (noise 
about 3mm and 200mm for phase and smoothed pseudorange observations, resp.). 


PRODUCTS GENERATED:
The following products are generated and uploaded into CDDIS @ NASA/GSFC
   EMR07020-6.EPH       GPS ephem. files for days 0-6, week # 702 in sp3 format 
   EMR07027.ERP        	pole x,y and DUT1 solutions for week # 702
   EMR07027.SUM		name of this text summary file 


REMARKS on EMR's products:
1. ALGO hydrogen maser used as a time reference. In the sp3 EPH file sat.
   epochs with no reference (e.g. ALGO not observing a satellite) have a value 
   of 99999. microseconds. 
   ALGO clock error & drift were about +340 ns (49158) & 30 ns/day w.r.t.
   GPS time.  
2. AS was on for june 20 & 21.  PRN18 only was effected and subsequently 
   deleted from processing for those two days.     
3. PRN25 was deleted from MCMU on jun24, due to noisy data. 
4. Modelling problems with PRN37 on jun26, with errors of 3.5 m.
-- 
Jan Kouba
Geodetic Survey of Canada
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Internet: kouba at geod.emr.ca