[IGSMAIL-5536]: IGS Ultra Comparison (IGU): 1409 4 06 (Resubmission)

Gerd Gendt3 igsacc at gfz-potsdam.de
Sat Jan 13 04:22:02 PST 2007


******************************************************************************
IGS Electronic Mail      13 Jan 04:22:13 PST 2007      Message Number 5536
******************************************************************************

Author:  AC Coordinator / GFZ Potsdam

Ultra Rapid IGS Orbit Comparison - Week 1409   Day: 4 Hour: 06  (Jan 11, 2007)

Contacts:  G. Gendt   (gendt at gfz-potsdam.de),
          Th. Nischan ( nisn at gfz-potsdam.de)


COMBINATION STRATEGY:
---------------------

For a complete description of the combination strategy along with all tables
and statistics, please refer to the IGS Final Combination reports posted on
CDDIS within 13 days after the end of the GPS week.

    
REMARKS concerning the Ultra Rapid Orbit Comparison:                                  
----------------------------------------------------

 1. The following Ultra-rapid orbits were excluded from the combination but
    kept for statistics:
    
             -> Centre: COU EMU ESU GFU GOU SIU USU IGU
    


    
ORBIT COMBINATION AND EVALUATION STATISTICS:                                    
--------------------------------------------                                    

Table 1: Daily transformation of each centre to the combined IGS Rapid orbit
         and clocks. 
         
         WRMS - RMS weighted by the centres SP3 header accuracy codes.
         STA  - Number of stations in the daily solutions.
         Units: mas, ppb, meters, nano-sec, nano-sec/day.
   
Table 1.1409.4   GPS week: 1409   Day: 4   MJD: 54111.250                            

CENT STA|  DX   DY   DZ    RX    RY    RZ  SCL  RMS WRMS |   TOFT  TDRFT    RMS
--------+------------------------------------------------+---------------------
brd  n/a| .31 -.32  .05  7.24  3.62 -4.37 10.4 1.06 1.06 |    -.0     .0  10.15
cou  119| .00 -.01 -.01   .69   .23   .69  -.3  .05  .03 |     .9   -8.1  13.08
emu   53| .01  .00 -.01   .30   .05  -.17   .1  .05  .03 |    2.4  -13.9   2.50
esu   37| .00  .00  .00   .55  -.23   .02   .2  .07  .05 |    8.8  -13.0   2.58
gfu   63| .00  .01  .00   .51  -.19  -.22   .0  .05  .04 |    2.2  -11.0   3.15
gou   57| .01 -.00  .00   .30   .17  -.30  -.3  .06  .03 |     .2   -4.2  10.92
siu   62|-.01  .04 -.01   .17  1.29   .51   .4  .12  .11 |     .0     .0    .0 
igu  n/a| .00  .01 -.00   .45   .05  -.02   .1  .03  .02 |    2.8  -12.1   2.72
igr  n/a| .0   .0   .0    .0    .0    .0    .0  .0   .0  |     .4   -9.3    .0 

     
     
Table 2: Daily fit for each satellite and each centre resulting from the
         comparison of the individual solutions to the IGS Rapid solution.
         (first 6 hours of the prediction)

         The "igr" and "IGR" columns are zero since all centres are
        "MEDI" stands for median of the centre's satellite RMS.

         Units: cm.

Table 2.1409.4   GPS week: 1409   Day: 4   Hour: 06   MJD: 54111.250                            

        Weighted Average                          
 PRN  | brd cou emu esu gfu gou siu igu igr  IGR |
------+------------------------------------------+
   1  | 154   2   3   3   3   4  13   2   0    0 |
   2  |  57   3   3   4   4   2   6   1   0    0 |
   3  | 229   3   3   3   4   6  15   2   0    0 |
   4  |  79   2   2   4   3   3   6   2   0    0 |
   5  |  78  14   9  15   4   6   9   7   0    0 |
   6  |  58   4   1   3   1   2   9   1   0    0 |
   7  |  44   1   2   3   3   2   7   1   0    0 |
   8  |  56  13  23   4   6   5  13   6   0    0 |
   9  |  73   2   4   5   4   2   8   3   0    0 |
  10E |  62   2   5   3  10   2  11   4   0    0 |
  11  | 111   4   3   6   4   3  10   2   0    0 |
  12  |  99   4   2   4   4   3  28   2   0    0 |
  13  | 106   2   3   3   5   3   7   2   0    0 |
  14  |  75   3   2   3   5   6  12   3   0    0 |
  15  | 139   1 ---  27   7  28  20  11   0    0 |
  16  |  94   2   2   3   3   3   5   2   0    0 |
  17  |  75   2   2   4   2   3  17   2   0    0 |
  18E | 114   2   3   4   5   3   8   2   0    0 |
  19  |  60   3   3   3   3   4  10   2   0    0 |
  20E | 156   4   4   3   5   4  11   3   0    0 |
  21  |  95   4   2   5   4   7   8   3   0    0 |
  22E |  89   1   2   6   4   3  17   2   0    0 |
  23  |  62   2   2   2   3   3   9   1   0    0 |
  24  | 171   2   2   4   2   3  10   2   0    0 |
  25  |  59   3   2   3   4   3  13   2   0    0 |
  26  |  77   3   4   8   5   2   9   1   0    0 |
  27  | 178   4   1   5   3   2  16   1   0    0 |
  28  | 101   2   2   6   3   4   7   3   0    0 |
  29  | 101   7   8 ---  10   7  10   6   0    0 |
  30  |  49   3   2   3   2   3   8   1   0    0 |
  31  |  96  10   5   6   4   5  14   4   0    0 |
------+------------------------------------------+
 RMS  | 106   5   5   7   5   6  12   3   0      |
 WRMS | 106   3   3   5   4   3  11   2   0      |
 MEDI |  89   3   2   4   4   3  10   2   0      |

   
     
Table 3: Daily fit for each satellite and each centre resulting from the
         comparison of the individual solutions to the IGS Rapid solution.
         (24 hours of adjusted orbits)

         The "igr" and "IGR" columns are zero since all centres are 
         "MEDI" stands for median of the centre's satellite RMS.

         Remark: COU results for 06 UT are the prediction from the 00 UT
                 results, i.e. last 6 hours are predicted and
                 are therefore excluded from the comparison.

        Units: cm.

Table 3.1409.3   GPS week: 1409   Day: 3   Hour: 06   MJD: 54110.250

        Weighted Average                      
 PRN  | cou emu esu gfu gou siu igu igr  IGR |
------+--------------------------------------+
   1  |   2   2   1   2   3   6   1   0    0 |
   2  |   2   2   3   2   2   6   2   0    0 |
   3  |   2   1   3   2   4   8   2   0    0 |
   4  |   1   2   2   2   1   6   1   0    0 |
   5  |   3   2   4   2   2   6   1   0    0 |
   6  |   1   2   2   2   3   5   1   0    0 |
   7  |   1   1   2   2   3   6   1   0    0 |
   8  |   4   6   2   3  10   8   3   0    0 |
   9  |   2   2   2   2   2   5   1   0    0 |
  10  |   2   3   2   3   2   5   1   0    0 |
  11  |   3   2   2   3   3   5   2   0    0 |
  12  |   2   2   4   2   3  14   2   0    0 |
  13  |   2   2   3   2   4   5   2   0    0 |
  14  |   2   1   2   2   5   5   1   0    0 |
  15  |   2 ---   9   3   8   6   3   0    0 |
  16  |   2   2   2   2   3   5   1   0    0 |
  17  |   2   1   2   2   2   9   1   0    0 |
  18  |   2   1   3   4   1   5   2   0    0 |
  19  |   2   1   3   2   4   7   1   0    0 |
  20  |   2   4   3   2   3   7   2   0    0 |
  21  |   2   2   3   2   4   5   2   0    0 |
  22  |   2   1   3   3   3   7   1   0    0 |
  23  |   2   2   3   3   4   7   2   0    0 |
  24  |   1   2   2   2   2   3   1   0    0 |
  25  |   2   2   2   2   4   4   1   0    0 |
  26  |   2   3   2   2   2   3   1   0    0 |
  27  |   2   2   3   2   3   7   1   0    0 |
  28  |   2   2   3   2   2   6   1   0    0 |
  29  |   3   5 ---   3   3   3   2   0    0 |
  30  |   1   2   2   1   2   6   1   0    0 |
  31  |   3   3   3   3   5   5   2   0    0 |
------+--------------------------------------+
 RMS  |   2   2   3   2   4   6   2   0      |
 WRMS |   2   2   3   2   3   6   1   0      |
 MEDI |   2   2   2   2   3   6   1   0      |



More information about the IGSMail mailing list