[IGS-DCWG-206] Fwd: RE: RAMO day 226 Rinex 2 file

[Nacho Romero]

Dear Data Centers,

FYI please read the email chain below and delete the file ramo2260.19d.Z 
from your repository as it is a bad file.


Thanks,

Nacho



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: 	RE: RAMO day 226 Rinex 2 file
Date: 	Thu, 15 Aug 2019 12:09:06 +0000
From: 	עומר בר <omer at mapi.gov.il>
To: 	'Nacho Romero' <nacho at canaryspaceconsulting.co.uk>
CC: 	David Maggert <dmaggert at unavco.org>, חגי רונן <hagi at mapi.gov.il>



Dear Dr. Nacho Romero,

On day 226 the site had hardware issue – and needed a reset, I'll check 
again for the connectivity properties and recording options.

In the mean-time please delete this file, I'll do my best to regain the 
data from the receiver (manually).

I'll keep you informed.

Thank you very much for noticing this issue.

Omer Bar

Geodetic Infrastructure

CORS project management

Geodesy division, Survey of Israel

omer at mapi.gov.il <mailto:omer at mapi.gov.il>    +972506225486

*From:*Nacho Romero <nacho at canaryspaceconsulting.co.uk>
*Sent:* Thursday, August 15, 2019 1:07 PM
*To:* עומר בר <omer at mapi.gov.il>; חגי רונן <hagi at mapi.gov.il>
*Cc:* David Maggert <dmaggert at unavco.org>
*Subject:* RAMO day 226 Rinex 2 file

hello,

I am the IGS Infrastructure Committee Chair and we have noticed that the 
Rinex 2 RAMO station file is very incorrect, the header is repeated 
three times and there is no tracking data inside;

ftp://cddis.nasa.gov/gnss/data/daily/2019/226/19d/ramo2260.19d.Z

Please ensure you have some mechanism to QC the files before you upload 
them. Thanks. We use teqc for this task and a quick QC with teqc clearly 
shows this file to be incorrect;

 > teqc +qcq ramo2260.19o

teqc: failure to read '     2.11           OBSERVATION DATA M 
(MIXED)           RINEX VERSION / TYPE' on line 12 of 'ramo2260.19o'
     (bad scan of RINEX version, type, and system or multiple 'RINEX 
VERSION / TYPE' lines) ... exiting

We are available should you have any further questions. the rest of the 
RAMO files checked seem to be OK it seems to only be a problem for day 
226 but we wanted to make sure we get ahead of this issue. Thanks.

-- 

Best regards,

Nacho

_______________________________________________________________

Ignacio (Nacho) Romero

Aerospace Engineer, PhD

CSC Ltd @ ESA/ESOC/OPS-GN

Satellite Navigation Engineer @ ESOC Navigation Support Office

IGS Infrastructure Committee Chair

www.navigation-office.esa.int  <http://www.navigation-office.esa.int>

www.canaryspaceconsulting.co.uk  <http://www.canaryspaceconsulting.co.uk>

_______________________________________________________________

This message including any attachments may contain confidential

information, according to our Information Security Management System,

  and intended solely for a specific individual to whom they are addressed.

  Any unauthorised copy, disclosure or distribution of this message

  is strictly forbidden. If you have received this transmission in error,

  please notify the sender immediately and delete it.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.igs.org/pipermail/igs-dcwg/attachments/20190815/27bd70d0/attachment.html>